[Foundation-l] Confidentiality agreement with FSF

[Thomas Dalton]

On 15/04/2008, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hoi,
>  Thomas Dalton does not want to accept that in a relation where specific
>  people deal with other diplomatically to reach a deal, when the people
>  involved are the ones representing their very organisations, that these
>  people have to be able to trust each other. In his misguided ideas he
>  assumes that he is entitled to have all the details. He does not consider
>  the ramifications of such actions. For me it qualifies as dense. It does
>  because it has already been stated that the point why this is necessary will
>  be made clear when appropriate.

I accept that if the other party insists on confidentiality, then we
have no choice. That doesn't seem to be the case here. If it was that
important to them, they would have put it in writing.