[Foundation-l] Creative Commons CC-BY-SA Draft Statement of Intent

Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen at gmail.com
Sun Apr 6 09:56:12 UTC 2008


Hoi,
When you insist on the enforcement of "share alike" in the strongest
possible way, you prevent mashing and collaboration. You prevent the use of
material in academic papers. In this way the medicine that are free and open
licenses is as bad as what it is to cure; restrictive licenses and
restrictive practices.

Obviously it is a choice, it may even be your choice but you *are *replacing
restrictive practices with restrictive practices..
Thanks,
      GerardM

On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 11:43 AM, geni <geniice at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 06/04/2008, Pharos <pharosofalexandria at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 10:34 PM, Erik Moeller <erik at wikimedia.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > >  We are continuing our conversations about that particular aspect, and
> >  >  my personal hope is that we will figure out a way to clearly state
> >  >  through the license that adaptations such as a picture embedded into
> a
> >  >  newspaper article trigger the share-alike clause, i.e. the newspaper
> >  >  article would be CC-BY-SA licensed. (Or, as I would argue, in those
> >  >  particular cases, any other DFCW compliant license.)
> >
> >
> > Have you at all considered the practical effect of such a redefinition?
> >
> >  The day such a redefinition is passed will not be the day that the
> >  world media suddenly shifts over to free content all-of-a-sudden in
> >  glorious revolution.
> >
> >  No, that will be the day when they stop using free-licensed photos at
> all.
> >
> >  Thanks,
> >
> > Pharos
>
> In the short term yes. But then Microsoft don't use gnu based stuff
> and Linux still ticks over. The argument is that incidental use of
> free images in non free text doesn't gain us anything anyway. However
> by using strong copyleft we can perhaps get free text releases from
> the likes of university and school newspapers. Perhaps society
> magazines rather than trying to target the top end and not getting
> much to show for it.
>
> Of course there is a new scientist article under a free license
> somewhere. It is under a free license so they could include a copy of
> a recipe for free cola.
>
>
> --
> geni
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>


More information about the foundation-l mailing list