[Foundation-l] WMF resolution on access to non-public data passed

[Anthony]

On 5/1/07, sannse <sannse at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Surely if your full details are known to Kat, and she is happy and
> > confident in them, we can reasonably say you are identified to the
> > foundation? The Foundation, or one of its agents, has privately and
> > directly verified your identity; it would, I assume, be satisfied with
> > that.
>
> I'm sure it would.  But I  would not be satisfied with that.  I oppose
> this policy, and so my feeling is that my only moral choices are to
> change my mind fully and follow the same verification process as
> everyone else, or to resign.
>
I still don't understand what your problem is with the policy.  You
say your name is none of our business.  That's fine, but then my IP
address is none of your business.

Anthony