ilpnewsletter at gmail.com
Sun Dec 30 23:12:19 UTC 2007
<sarcasm>Didn't you know? There isn't any.</sarcasm>
> I am still puzzled. In your model below, I can only see the cycle
> trustees+ ed(+external experts) ->nominating committee -> trustees
> Where is the community input?
>> * One possible model: a set of criteria for Board members, with an
>> expert Nominating Committee member charged with responsibility for
>> evaluating candidates based on any one criterion. Criteria might
>> include community values, wiki experience, managerial experience,
>> financial skills, understanding of our legal context, collaborative
>> nature, etc.
>> * The NC should recommend a completely new interim Board ASAP (it
>> could and probably should include existing Board members - but this
>> would be up to the NC to decide, based on a serious skills
>> * The interim Board would serve for a period of a year; at the end of
>> that period, the NC would recommend to renew terms or replace Board
>> members. New Board members would have to come from the Advisory Board
>> or the Community Council.
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
More information about the foundation-l