[Foundation-l] A dangerous precedent
saintonge at telus.net
Sat Dec 29 11:12:30 UTC 2007
Daniel Arnold wrote:
> Am Samstag, 29. Dezember 2007 09:40:46 schrieb Nikola Smolenski:
>> With it, it is possible to effectively have articles about various topics
>> similar to bot-generated articles without them actually being in the
>> database. It is possible to kickstart a small Wikipedia by translating a
>> handful of templates. And, it is possible to further expand the articles,
>> as it is with bot generated articles.
> I like people "just do things" but please do not "kickstart" small Wikipedias
> with template translation. It is that: A painfull kick in the ... of the
> I simply don't want to sit in the same boat with people that think a bot
> generated article is useful. I don't want to sit in the same boat with
> projects that don't have the patience to grow sustainable.
> If further small Wikipedias are starting to cheat like vo.wp I can guarantee
> you that there will be a split of Wikipedias.
I would disagree with rejecting all bot generated articles, within
pre-defined circumstances they can be very useful. There were a lot of
complaints when RamBot was putting up his small town articles, but they
all managed to survive because there is a big enough community to review
With a small community, a single tech savvy person using a bot can too
easily overwhelm the operational capacity of that community
More information about the foundation-l