[Foundation-l] Fair use images
Ray Saintonge
saintonge at telus.net
Thu Mar 9 17:08:13 UTC 2006
W. Guy Finley wrote:
>I think the first step is that any unlicensed image being uploaded as fair
>use and does not have a source and fair use rationale should be speedied. I
>bet that's more than half of them right there. The process of tagging them
>as no source and then waiting a week is just way too long and too
>susceptible to error. It's the UPLOADER'S duty to make sure he/she is
>meeting license requirements, if they aren't met the image should go. It
>shouldn't be the duty of the reviewer to prove it and that's usually the
>perception.
>
When you consider that some of these have already been here for a long
time without attracting attention, one more week is obviously a very
short time to wait. It avoids the error of creating unnecessary
confusion. Nobody's challenging the uploader's duty, or passing that
duty on to the reviewer; your unique perception does not make it so.
There's no reason to panic about this.
Ec
More information about the foundation-l
mailing list