Hmm, This one really has me stumped: http://stats.grok.se/en/latest90/Yahoo! That is not a wikibump, but some sort of structural thing. The only thing I can think of is that some sort of popular band, manga character, or porn queen in China has been named Yahoo! Jane
2013/7/11, Toby Negrin tnegrin@wikimedia.org:
We have some bot information from wikistats herehttp://stats.wikimedia.org/#bots. I don't think it's particularly actionable for what you are doing, but it might be interesting directionally.
-Toby
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Jeremy Baron jeremy@tuxmachine.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Noneof MicrosoftsBusiness phonenumberofthebeast@hotmail.com wrote:
We've been working on tracking down the top 25 articles for each week,
but
as you can see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:5000
it requires determining which rankings are due to actual human views and which are due to bots, and recently, the bots have been having a field
day.
I've been asked by the creator of the list to ask you for help and/or
advice
on how to use analytics to separate human from non-human views. Please
let
me know if there's anything that can be done.
I think at this point that would either require a change to the format of the domas (anonymized) stats or an NDA and maybe some other approvals. (or kraken! but rumor is that's not yet ready for the general public)
-Jeremy
Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics