Hi,
On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 14:29 -0700, Quim Gil wrote:
I also expect improvements in the interface, based on
our feedback...
Where would be the best feedback channel?
Mailing list? Some component in Bugzilla?
Or is it too early for this and I should wait?
Examples:
*
http://bitergia.com/public/previews/VizGrimoireJS/browser/people.html?id=13…
confuses me. Apart from using Spanish month names and assuming that "Commits per
month" refers to the code repositories, I have not made any commits in 2011 but the
graph says so. I did not even have a Wikimedia Gerrit account at that time. :)
*
http://bitergia.com/projects/mediawiki-dashboard/browser/its.html lists "Top
its_closers last month". Does this only refer to tickets under the Bugzilla product
"MediaWiki"? Looking at
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/weekly-bug-summary.cgi?tops=10&days=32 and "Top 10
people who resolved the most reports in the last 32 days", I see very different names
(but that's Bugzilla-wide and cross-product).
* As people use different email addresses across mailing lists,
Bugzilla, and Gerrit, I'm curious if there is a plan to map this
accounts to each other. Somehow.
* Same question for mapping resources to each other, e.g.
project-specific mailing lists to the corresponding Git
repository to the corresponding project or component in
Bugzilla. When I played with Apache and GNOME projects a few
months ago I tried to use their DOAP files to get metadata on
resources, but I'm not aware of some similar concept in
Wikimedia.
* Personally I think I'm most curious about statistics how many
users are active in a specific codebase repository, to identify
bus factors. (When I ran "git log" on a full checkout of GNOME's
Git repository a few months ago, one third of the projects were
dead and had not seen any code commits in two years, excluding
translation updates which are in subfolders.)
Cheers,
andre
--
Andre Klapper | Wikimedia Bugwrangler
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/