Hi,
On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 14:29 -0700, Quim Gil wrote:
I also expect improvements in the interface, based on our feedback...
Where would be the best feedback channel? Mailing list? Some component in Bugzilla? Or is it too early for this and I should wait?
Examples: * http://bitergia.com/public/previews/VizGrimoireJS/browser/people.html?id=13&... confuses me. Apart from using Spanish month names and assuming that "Commits per month" refers to the code repositories, I have not made any commits in 2011 but the graph says so. I did not even have a Wikimedia Gerrit account at that time. :) * http://bitergia.com/projects/mediawiki-dashboard/browser/its.html lists "Top its_closers last month". Does this only refer to tickets under the Bugzilla product "MediaWiki"? Looking at https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/weekly-bug-summary.cgi?tops=10&days=32 and "Top 10 people who resolved the most reports in the last 32 days", I see very different names (but that's Bugzilla-wide and cross-product). * As people use different email addresses across mailing lists, Bugzilla, and Gerrit, I'm curious if there is a plan to map this accounts to each other. Somehow. * Same question for mapping resources to each other, e.g. project-specific mailing lists to the corresponding Git repository to the corresponding project or component in Bugzilla. When I played with Apache and GNOME projects a few months ago I tried to use their DOAP files to get metadata on resources, but I'm not aware of some similar concept in Wikimedia. * Personally I think I'm most curious about statistics how many users are active in a specific codebase repository, to identify bus factors. (When I ran "git log" on a full checkout of GNOME's Git repository a few months ago, one third of the projects were dead and had not seen any code commits in two years, excluding translation updates which are in subfolders.)
Cheers, andre