On 25.04.2012 19:10, Brion Vibber wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Gabriel Wicke <wicke@wikidev.net mailto:wicke@wikidev.net> wrote:
On 04/25/2012 06:42 PM, Brion Vibber wrote: > It's a human-readable text format, so I'd advocate for text/x-wiki. I > don't know where or how the application/x-wiki came about. This was pretty much the reason why I picked it for action=raw back then. I like Daniel's idea to use something more specific to MediaWiki though. Maybe text/x-mediawiki?I'm down with that. :)
Well... changing the mime type now might break a bunch of clients that rely on it, no? At least in cases where it's actually used in a ContentType header.
For practical reasons, I suggest to stay with application/x-wiki, and make action=raw use that too, unless ctype=text/x-wiki. then it should use text/x-wiki in the ContentType header too.
-- daniel