Interesting. Apologies for probably going over old ground as a
latecomer, but I had assumed that Wikispore was sufficiently proximate
to Mediawiki that the [
]
would have to apply?
In an exceptional situation, if someone complained to the Foundation
about something that had happened in the Wikispore space, wouldn't they
see it in their remit to take action? If that is so, shouldn't at least
the "Unacceptable behaviour" provisions of the Mediawiki Code be
explicitly bound in? (Though also taking Denny's point about the
positives of that Berlin Code.)
On 16/07/2020 07:16, Željko Blaće wrote:
Maybe we can bring some of the unfinished discussions
like CoC to this Sunday?
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 5:19 AM Samuel Klein <meta.sj(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1 to the berlin COC.
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 5:14 AM Željko Blaće <zblace(a)mi2.hr> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 4:15 AM Denny Vrandečić <vrandecic(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>
>>> I have checked with a few people, and here are some concerns regarding
Wikispore, which, I am sure, can be easily resolved. I am happy to help with the first
three if I sense consensus on these topics.
>>>
>>> 1) Privacy policy
>>> 2) Terms of use
>>> 3) Code of Conduct
>>
>>
>> Thank you Denny for bringing this up! Much appreciated and important now.
>>
>>>
>>> I am sure we'll easily agree on the first two, just taking the respective
policies from the other WMF Wikis and link them accordingly.
>>>
>>> Regarding 3),
mediawiki.org has a CoC, meta does not, and I would really like
us to start Spores per default with a CoC. What are your thoughts?
>>
>>
>> Though I think being explicit about #Unacceptable_behavior
>>
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Code_of_Conduct#Unacceptable_behavior
>> I find it super-important to have consensus also on #3-expected-behavior !
>> My preferences here are with
https://BerlinCodeOfConduct.org/
>> that originated from
https://pdxruby.org/CONDUCT#3-expected-behavior
>>
>> Personally I find most of the older projects often unsupportive
>> and even made toxic for newbies to join due to 'legal' bot-like behavior
>> or passive agressive of older (highly patronizing and teritorial) admins...
>> ...as the project matures this should be monitored for and suppressed,
>> but ideally also discouraged from the start by Expected_Behavior policy.
>>
>> Best Z