---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: emijrp emijrp@gmail.com Date: Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 12:11 AM Subject: Re: [Gendergap] Statistics about gender gap To: Increasing female participation in Wikimedia projects gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
Here is the accumulate by project family http://toolserver.org/~emijrp/wmcharts/wmchart0013.html%C2%A0Wikiquote, Wikisource and Wikiversity are the winners.
2012/2/2 John Vandenberg jayvdb@gmail.com
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 11:05 AM, emijrp emijrp@gmail.com wrote:
2012/2/2 Sarah Stierch sarah.stierch@gmail.com
... What else are people seeing in their chosen languages that might be interesting? Anything surprising?
No. Only a few examples where women are 15-25% of edits some days but in small Wikipedias or sister projects. They are not representative.
I think (hope..) you might find a high female participate rate even if you aggregate across all of the Wikisource projects.
-- John Vandenberg
Thanks for this forward. It's not so surprising indeed, and I think pl.quote has several very active female users, while it.quote's are a bit less active lately. The information is very partial because Wikiquote, in particular en.quote, has a lot of users who make small contributions and will probably not set their preference (even if they register), so I expect it to be better than showed in the graph.
Nemo
wikiquote-l@lists.wikimedia.org