Is not this suggestion a variation on rule by consensus? What about objective standards? Whatever we agree on (consensus) it must be auditable. Norman
----- Original Message ---- From: David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com To: Dan Kindsvater dank55@gmail.com; Wikimedia Quality Discussions wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 11:22:36 AM Subject: Re: [Wikiquality-l] "sighted", and another metric
2008/5/14 Dan Kindsvater dank55@gmail.com:
The most important metric to me and many editors is how many quality articles we're producing. A major reason for Flagged Versions is that various content experts have told us that this is one thing they need if we want their help. So, one important metric I'd like to suggest is to survey and count the number of new editors who say that the new feature is a major reason they decided to start participating.
Also: note that Wikinews (en:wn at least) really wants sighted/stable versions displayed by default so that they will make it into aggregators, specifically Google News.
- d.
_______________________________________________ Wikiquality-l mailing list Wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiquality-l
wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org