Hiho,
as most of you will have heard, flagged revisions were turned on on de.wikipedia.org. You can follow progress on http://tools.wikimedia.de/~aka/cgi-bin/reviewcnt.cgi. Now, it would be important to measure success of flagged revisions in some way. The following metrics come to my mind:
-Number of articles with a sighted revision (not very useful though, but measures acceptance among editors in a way.) -Number of articles that have a sighted revision but where the current version is not sighted -Time needed to sight revisions (max and mean of time until a revision by a noneditor is sighted. The mean is very difficult to get, but could be computed by using the mean of the pages in Spezial:OldReviewedPages) -Number of editors, meaning users who have the right to sight edits (again, acceptance but also to see if we hinder people in editing more than we should)
Do you have more ideas for metrics and how to measure them?
Best,
Philipp
2008/5/14 P. Birken pbirken@gmail.com:
Do you have more ideas for metrics and how to measure them?
Edit rate pre and post sighting
Edit rate by logged in users pre and post sighting
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:13 PM, P. Birken pbirken@gmail.com wrote:
-Number of articles that have a sighted revision but where the current version is not sighted
Both in terms of number of articles and in number (or age) of unsighted versions.
Do you have more ideas for metrics and how to measure them?
Using the Wikistats data from dammit.lt/wikistats or a similar more direct source, it would be interesting to see how many visitors did see the most current version of an article because it was also flagged as sighted at that time.
wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org