Meh, I'd stick to the current system of adding {{NPOV}} and such tags. I
don't want a feature bloat on this extension.
One note about the review interface, I set the default for unreviewed
revisions to "sighted,basic,acceptable" (level 1) for the dropdowns. This
should allow for many 1-click reviews.
<div><FONT color=#3333cc>-Aaron Schulz</FONT></div></html>
From: Daniel Arnold <arnomane(a)gmx.de>
Reply-To: Wikimedia Quality Discussions <wikiquality-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
To: Wikimedia Quality Discussions <wikiquality-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Subject: [Wikiquality-l] Types of flags
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 13:15:51 +0200
Hi,
As it did come up in the past that things like {{neutrality}}, {{cleanup}}
and
such maybe can be replaced by this extension too and as the currently
suggested interface (
http://www.baach.de/wpdesign/Main_Page_2.html) has
quality related flags which are not really useful for tagging an individual
version only (such as readability of a text) I ask if the design is
flexible
enough to support flags per article (and not only per article version) too.
These flags would be binary flags that are applied to an article until they
are explicitely removed again. Examples would
be: "Neutrality", "Cleanup", "Featured Article"...
Cheers, Arnomane
<< signature.asc >>
_______________________________________________
Wikiquality-l mailing list
Wikiquality-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiquality-l
_________________________________________________________________
More photos, more messages, more storageget 2GB with Windows Live Hotmail.
http://imagine-windowslive.com/hotmail/?locale=en-us&ocid=TXT_TAGHM_mig…