Yes, I fully agree. We should start on a small project where people are interested. We can consider the bigger wikis later, once we are confident that we like it and it works the way we want. I was citing Enwiki just to discuss potential performance. Ian and I can help with advice etc anyone who wants to try this out. Luca
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 6:54 PM, Andrew Whitworth wknight8111@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 9:42 PM, mike.lifeguard mike.lifeguard@gmail.com wrote:
even on the English Wikipedia (5 edits / second at most?) a single CPU would suffice
But why start so large? Pick a smaller test wiki first like, say, en.wikibooks? We can throw that into the queue of things we want installed down at WB.
--Andrew Whitworth
Wikiquality-l mailing list Wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiquality-l