Yeah, I was thinking about cutting that for a while. Note that there *is* a large comment box, but it is disabled by default (and is for all reviewer/editors when on). Also it shows on the bottom of pages when on.
The automatic [x=a,y=b] stuff in the comment can be kind of long, so I don't want long log comments though. So I may just disable comments for editors for now, as it does simplify the form.
-Aaron Schulz
From: "P. Birken" pbirken@gmail.com Reply-To: Wikimedia Quality Discussions wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org To: "Wikimedia Quality Discussions" wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Wikiquality-l] Usability Points Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 16:00:59 +0200
Thanks for the quick hack, Aaron! I came upon a second point that might make life easier for most of the users.
Those that have only editor and not reviewer rights essentially don't need the possibility to comment why they flagged a page as sighted. There shouldn't be much to discuss about this, anyhow and would result in smoother workflow for editors. This is not the case for actual reviews. Therefore, I think that only reviewers should see the comment box. Or, which sounds also nice: nobody sees the comment box at first, but if a reviewer rates an article for more than sighted, a box appears (similar to a delete-action), where he can write a comment. In particular, we could provide reviewers with a larger comment box than now.
Bye,
Philipp
Wikiquality-l mailing list Wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiquality-l
_________________________________________________________________ Find a local pizza place, movie theater, and moreĀ .then map the best route! http://maps.live.com/default.aspx?v=2&ss=yp.bars~yp.pizza~yp.movie%20the...