I know I'm dropping in a bit late, and perhaps this was already handled, but while I was testing this evening, it seems to be that when a non-editor reverts a page back to the last sighted version, it still reads current.
Wouldn't it make sense that if the version reverted to is in and of itself sighted, that that should be reflected, regardless of the person performing the revision?
Or am I missing something?
Thanks,
--Avi