Aaron Schulz wrote:
When I say "precedence", I mean that if there is an examined and a mere stable version for page, the examined one is the default page. If that revision is depreciated/deleted, then the stable version would then be the default.
As for the oddness at http://www.baach.de/phase3de/index.php/Chemiker, the tags seem to be misconfigured there, as accuracy 1 counts as quality.
I've added http://www.baach.de/phase3/index.php/Chemist with the same sort of ratings, so you can compare the two approaches.
The software is currently more optimal for the latter, but Phase3de illustrates a reasonable alternative. I think we need to carefully consider the difference between these two approaches.
The crux of the issue is whether recent "Sighted/Stable" versions should be ignored if any "Examined/Quality" version exists, no matter how old it may be.
In favor of such precedence is that the presumed quality is what is made available to readers (by default).
Against it is that recent versions remain hidden, even though not vandalized, until someone puts in the effort to do a new inspection (and often editing) to produce a new, more recent, "Examined/Quality" version.
-RS