2007/4/29, R. S. Shaw shaww@inbox.com:
Against it is that recent versions remain hidden, even though not vandalized, until someone puts in the effort to do a new inspection (and often editing) to produce a new, more recent, "Examined/Quality" version.
Yes, that's the problem. We have to keep in mind that no matter what the exact definition of "examined/reviewed" is, it will require more effort to tag than sighted. Since we are not really sure whether the tagging of versions as sighted will actually scale, I'm quite sure that tagging as examined will not. Thus, the usual situation will be the one mentioned by RS will be quite common. Therefore, I would suggest not giving examined precedence. This is also already part of the german proposal.
Bye,
Philipp