On 4/3/07, Gregory Maxwell gmaxwell@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/2/07, Erik Moeller erik@wikimedia.org wrote:
I think that's pretty important to have; if want vandalism review (which is going to have the biggest PR impact) to be scalable, we need to be able to flag lots of changes by trusted users automatically as non-vandalism.
My understanding of this feature was that if the current version is trusted and a trusted editor edits it, their version will preserve the non-vandalized level of review automatically. Correct?
Yes, that's how it should work. If it is not trusted, it would be nice if the editor can see an expandable (JavaScripty) diff and quickly approve previous edits as unvandalized _while_ making his own.