When I say "precedence", I mean that if there is an examined and a mere stable version for page, the examined one is the default page. If that revision is depreciated/deleted, then the stable version would then be the default.
As for the oddness at http://www.baach.de/phase3de/index.php/Chemiker, the tags seem to be misconfigured there, as accuracy 1 counts as quality.
I'd stick to using http://www.baach.de/phase3/index.php.
<html><div><FONT color=#3333cc>-Jason Schulz</FONT></div></html>
From: "P. Birken" pbirken@gmail.com Reply-To: Wikimedia Quality Discussions wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org To: "Wikimedia Quality Discussions" wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Wikiquality-l] Clearify some things Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:09:19 +0200
Hiho
2007/4/27, Aaron Schulz jschulz_4587@msn.com:
OK, I don't like the idea of reducing all of the tags to just one, it
still
useful to have a depth/style rating, or any others. The idea is that
sighted
revisions are just at minimal quality in each type.
The schema has been changed quite a bit, though I think I am satisfied
with
how it is now.
Yes, that looks logically sound and like it will work.
Expert reviewed revisions take precedence over sighted revisions.
Could you explain this?
By default we have the following classification:
*quality (expert reviewed): accuracy >= 2, depth >= 1, style >=1 *stable (sighted): accuracy >=1, depth >= 1, style >=1
Revisions cannot be reviewed unless each tag type is at least at level
Reviewed revisions should at least be decent in each category, otherwise reviewing them would look bad.
That would work, though I have problems imagining articles that fail accuracy and depth 1.
I also thought that we might use this system to replace "Neutrality"- or other tags. This would certainly improve things in the way that editwars over these tags no longer disturb the version history. However, replacing this with tagging wars is only a slight improvement. Studid idea?
Bye,
Philipp
Wikiquality-l mailing list Wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiquality-l
_________________________________________________________________ Interest Rates NEAR 39yr LOWS! $430,000 Mortgage for $1,299/mo - Calculate new payment http://www.lowermybills.com/lre/index.jsp?sourceid=lmb-9632-19132&moid=1...