2007/8/16, Aaron Schulz jschulz_4587@msn.com:
- As for new articles, it only takes one click to review it, and often
pages start off pretty rate, so some users may end up wanting to unreview it for a while then.
Every unnecessary click is one too many, as it will cause users not to use the system and/or to get annoyed. Usability is very important. As the threshhold for sighted is very low, I don't see a problem with this being done automatically. Having the first version of an article sighted will not protect from RfDs anyhow.
- I don't know what you must be referring to by "the creation of new
versions by trusted users in the case that the current version is sighted. Then, diffs are not needed for reviewing." Are you referring to a trusted user editing a page that is already sighted? Again, if they add a template/image, you cannot just take the current version of those templates/images and make them part of a sighted revision. If while I was adding an image to a reviewed page, as a reviewer, the image was vandalized, you'd end up with a bad stable version.
Well, yes, but what's the point. I can either use preview, or if I forgot, I simply create anoother version directly afterwards with the correct template. Having a template vandalized is rare, having users creating new versions happens all the time.
Bye,
Philipp
From: "P. Birken" pbirken@gmail.com Reply-To: Wikimedia Quality Discussions wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org To: "Wikimedia Quality Discussions" wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Wikiquality-l] Issues with FlaggedRevs Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 23:54:32 +0200
2007/8/15, Aaron Schulz jschulz_4587@msn.com:
What you cannot do is just have a diff shown on edit and have it review *and* save at the same time. As long is the review is done after the
save,
it's fine.
OK, but that's not a problem. The setting Erik and I are talking about are twofold, namely the creation of new articles by trusted users and the creation of new versions by trusted users in the case that the current version is sighted. Then, diffs are not needed for reviewing.
Bye,
Philipp
Wikiquality-l mailing list Wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiquality-l
Learn.Laugh.Share. Reallivemoms is right place! http://www.reallivemoms.com?ocid=TXT_TAGHM&loc=us
Wikiquality-l mailing list Wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiquality-l