Unacceptable. Not indicating that the version the user is looking at is (completely or partially) sighted is a dealbreaker for using this anywhere.
On 10/6/07, Aaron Schulz jschulz_4587@msn.com wrote:
In that case, even one change to a template would make it not show. I fear that on wikipedia, that condition would rarely show up, and I'm not sure it's worth the performance hit.
What I am doing is improving the "diff to stable" to list out the templates/images changed.
-Aaron Schulz
Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 18:45:03 +0200 From: erik@wikimedia.org
To: wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Wikiquality-l] Reverts
The previous behavior was even more broken. We should only show the "current and sighted" message if both the page _and_ all templates are sighted.
On 10/6/07, Aaron Schulz jschulz_4587@msn.com wrote:
No, it looks fine to me:
http://wikixp.org/qa/index.php5?title=Berlin&stable=1
That is the stable version. The old static version are here
http://wikixp.org/qa/index.php5?title=Special:Stableversions&page=Berlin
. They are fine too.
The UI saying "current & sighted" is misleading. Erik changed it to do
that
if the current rev ID = latest stable rev ID. I avoided that because
images
and templates might differ. For logged in users, they see the current revision. But if it the ID = last stable ID, the message shows like
"current
& reviewed" whatever, which is misleading. I'm tempted to revert the changes. Another issue is that someone locally turned off the "stable"
tab.
-Aaron Schulz
Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 10:07:22 +0200 From: pbirken@gmail.com
To: wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Wikiquality-l] Reverts
I tested this in
http://wikixp.org/qa/index.php5/Berlin:
the old
version
was
created when the template was not vandalized, still the current, vandalized template is shown.
Bye,
Philipp
2007/10/5, Aaron Schulz jschulz_4587@msn.com:
The expanded text at the time is stored, with tables listing the corresponding template/image version used when parsed. It is still
the
same...
-Aaron Schulz
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 18:05:24 +0100 From: dgerard@gmail.com To: wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Wikiquality-l] Reverts
On 05/10/2007, P. Birken pbirken@gmail.com wrote:
> It seems that templates are not stored with a stable version
anymore?
> Is that correct, Aaron?
Um, that would be really bad, and is a really glaring avenue for
vandalism.
- d.
Wikiquality-l mailing list Wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiquality-l
Climb to the top of the charts! Play Star Shuffle: the word scramble challenge with star power. Play Now! _______________________________________________ Wikiquality-l mailing list Wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiquality-l
Wikiquality-l mailing list Wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiquality-l
Climb to the top of the charts! Play Star Shuffle: the word scramble challenge with star power. Play Now! _______________________________________________ Wikiquality-l mailing list Wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiquality-l
-- Toward Peace, Love & Progress: Erik
DISCLAIMER: This message does not represent an official position of the Wikimedia Foundation or its Board of Trustees.
Wikiquality-l mailing list Wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiquality-l
Help yourself to FREE treats served up daily at the Messenger Café. Stop by today! _______________________________________________ Wikiquality-l mailing list Wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiquality-l