Also! Just to introduce myself, I'm one of the interns with the Program Evaluation & Design team - thus this upgrade is very timely. Thank you!
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Edward Galvez egalvez@wikimedia.orgwrote:
Thanks for this! Just did a cohort of 15K and it worked fine. I unintentionally hit the "back" button, but after clicking "forward" and my cohort was validated, not even 10 seconds later.
Also, I can't seem to find the place that listed which users were not valid. Did we lose that ability?
- E
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Dan Andreescu dandreescu@wikimedia.orgwrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Dario Taraborelli < dtaraborelli@wikimedia.org> wrote:
fantastic, is there any chance we could get an even better performance if we allowed users to specify the field type in the upload form (if it’s just user_ids, validation will be faster and the app doesn’t need to check every single entry for a valid user_name too). I understand that by design the application makes no assumption about the type of that field (and in fact it accepts a mix of user_id’s and user_names, correct)?
absolutely, it would run up to 2x faster if the file was all user_ids and the user specified that up front. But currently, yes, you can mix user_ids and user_names
Wikimetrics mailing list Wikimetrics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimetrics