Dear all,
last weekend the annual Chapters Meeting took place in Berlin. Each year two representatives of each Wikimedia chapter meet there. During the meeting South Africa was recognized as the first african chapter. Wikimedia CH and Austria have been represented by Manuel Schneider and Kurt Kulac. With this report we'd like to share our experiences with the Wikimedia community. Additionally all sessions have been logged and published on Meta: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Documentation
A short TV report on the meeting for ARD Tagesschau (in german) can be viewed online: http://www.tagesschau.de/multimedia/video/sendungsbeitrag101886_res-.html
== Current State of the Chapters == Traditionally each chapter meeting starts with a three minute report of each chapter about their current state: Members, budget, past and future projects, good and bad experiences.
Most of the "State of the Chapter" presentations have been linked on Meta: * http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Schedule#State_of_t... * http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Schedule#State_of_t...
* WMCH: http://wikimedia.ch/State_of_the_Chapter_2011 * WMAT: http://mitglieder.wikimedia.at/Archiv/2011-03-26_State_of_the_Chapter
== Fundraising Summit == There will be again a Fundraising Summit for all chapters participating in the Wikimedia Fundraiser by the end of the year. This year's summit will be organised in June by Wikimedia Österreich.
* http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fundraising_2011/Fundraising_Summit
== Movement Roles == There are the Wikimedia Foundation and Wikimedia Chapters as branches of the Foundation, but there are also other entities and organisations withing the Wikiverse. While the relationship between Foundation and chapters has been settled by the chapters agreement there are many open questions in how to handle other organisations which are not chapters.
A "Movement Roles Working Group" has been set up a year ago that is researching this topic. Recently surveys have been sent out to chapter people (I have forwarded them to the respective boards) and a public survey is planned to be published soon.
All members and inhabitants of the Wikiverse are urged to participate in this process, to shape the roles of chapters, foundation and their own.
* http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_roles_project * http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_roles_project/New_group_models * http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_roles_project/Sue_Gardner%27s_input_... * http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Documentation/Movem...
== Collaborations with Galeries, Libraries, Archives and Museums (GLAMs) == The other chapters have presented their experiences with talking to GLAMs. In many countries discussions and talks happen and GLAMs are willing to cooperate, but a there is little visible output.
The Wiki Loves Monuments project interacts here, aiming to be a pan-european project to define, list and illustrate all monuments throughout Europe. Ideas are currently being discussed, WMAT started talking to the administration bodies taking care of monuments, lists need to be digitized and unified. A photo competition and reimbursement of travel costs should foster the communities will to take good pictures of all monuments. WMNL has been able to get sitenotices up to attract more people for the project. Other ideas are to provide extensive amounts of swag, such as sticker, pins, T-Shirts etc.
* http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Documentation/Worki... * http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Documentation/GLAM_...
== Hiring Employees == Many chapters - as Wikimedia Austria and Switzerland - have been thinking about hiring employees or to outsource work to paid people. Many projects are time-intensive and participating at the Wikimedia Fundraiser is hard to be handled on a volunteer basis due to the high amount of donations which need to be booked correctly, thanked and reported.
Several times statements like "Wikimedia chapters are no fan clubs" have been made. Conclusion: Wikimedia chapters are primarily administrative organisations which enable volunteers to do their work better and "enable others to be fan-clubs". With the needed professionalisation of the chapters their boards change from executive to overseeing committees. Along with this it is important to transfer (seed) the enthusiasm by the board members into the director / manager of the chapters office.
A few chapters have already stepped forward by applying different strategies:
* WMDE: "Management Approach" - They hired an employee that can manage himself and is looking for new tasks and implemented them on his own. This is important as management and monitoring of employees - which is also a big effort - can be minimised. A good manager can also fund himself by finding new opportunities and is able to find new employees to support him as the work load increases, a scalable solution.
A manager writes proposals which the board will review and decide. By that the board actually gets more power as it can act strategically rather than ad-hoc under pressure of daily tasks.
* WMPL: "Outsourcing" - legally neccessary tasks have been outsourced early. Problem: different people for different tasks which do not know each other and do not act strategically. WMPL: "...in the end we had an accountant, but nobody had time to bring her the receipts so she could do her work."
New approach: Hire someone who can do different things on his own and have him sit in the WMPL office.
* Office space: Rent offices teogether with other "lime-minded organisations", such as the parlamentarian group digital sustainability, Free Software Foundation Europe, Swiss Unix Usergroup, Creative Commons...
* Job profiles: Look at what the other chapters have done, for instance the "office manager" of WMUK who has handled the fundraiser.
* If you develop your organisation then get a "manager type" of employee. * If you only need a service center for your administrative tasks then outsource it.
* Selection of emplyees: It is helpful if the employee is a Wikimedian but this is not the qualification you are looking for. If you have to choose between a manager which is not a Wikimedian and a Wikimedian which is not a manager, choose the manager (Pavel, WMDE).
* Managing remotely is extremely hard. It takes longer to find out if something goes into the wrong direction (Thierry, WMFR). A manager will also manage itself.
* An employee should have one or at max two bosses and not the board as a boss. Otherwise it takes too longe to make management decision.
* At least a weekly Skype meeting is recommended, the verbal contact is very important rather than writing e-mails.
* Application process (WMFR): ** received 40 applications, two filters: eight left. These eight applicants have been interviewed by eight people from the board and involved members. ** a Wikimedian has the advantage that you already know him and how he works. But be careful with "super members", there is the risk of leading into demotivation and problems. It is sometimes better to employ someone from the outside.
Invitation by Pavel (WMDE): "We have gained a lot of experience. Just come a week to Berlin and look how I deal with it."
* http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Documentation/Profe...
== openZIM (Wikipedia Offline) == The ZIM libraries have been recently included into the book printing funtion - now everyone can easily create ZIM files from the Wikis.
To make the code and the work on it more visible it should be transferred to svn.wikimedia.org. Each commit is sent to IRC and mailinglist, also many developers have a copy of that repository so the hurdle to look into the code and work with it is much lower.
== Internal Organisation / Roles within the Chapters == Several sessions dealt with the tasks withing the chapters or the motivation of members. We agreed on the following types of members: * proactive (they initiate things and do work on their own) * active (they are active when being asked) * inactive * counter-active (trolls)
The goal is to convert inactive members to active members and active to proactive. Trolls are part of the ecosystem and sometimes have a corrective function. In doubt when there is to much hassle nobody should hesitate to exclude them from the chapter.
* Each organisation needs to fill in four functions - of which a single person can at max. fill in three: ** Production (get things done) ** Administration (organisation) ** Innovation (new ideas, development) ** Integration (people person)
* Convert members to active members: ** often it helps to contact people directly and personally - often nobody responds on mailinglists ** keep a list of tasks in your chapters wiki to give interested people a hint where they can start working on. Ask on your members on the mailinglist to sign up for these tasks.
* Each board should consist of the following positions: ** people person, social integrator ** secretary / administrator ** contact person for the community - must have a good standing inside the Wikimedia projects before becoming a board member
* http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Documentation/Volun...
== Communication == Different chapters communicate in different ways. The suggested monthly report is provided by a small number of chapters only (WMCH: No report since a long time). There has been a lot of discussion on the effort needed in writing those reports and the possibility to re-use them. Many chapters write blog posts, others communicate on Twitter or Facebook, usually in their own language. Other chapters have no benefit from that and can't learn from each other or simply know what is going on in the Wikiverse.
The following solution was agreed on: * each chapter should have a blog and post there regularly ** messages for other chapters should be tagged with "chapter" ** all chapter blogs should be aggregate by two Wikimedia planets: *** there are already Wikimedia planets for different languages *** a new Wikimedia planet for chapters (all languages) should be created ** link your blogs with social networks to make your posts to appear there: *** Twitter *** Facebook
* publish interesting news also on the Wikimedia SignPost
* monthly newsletter to the members ** newsletter can be prepared publicly on the chapters wiki, so everyone can contribute his or her project ** one person writes a summary of what is going on at Wikimedia
* print hand outs or even bulletings when you have conferences or assemblies ** handouts should always be available ** get an ISSN for bulletins to make your publications more visible
* a template for the chapters report should hold the minimal information needed by the Wikimedia Foundation ** this template will be published on Meta ** the state of the chapter presentations will have the minimal information, they should go directly to the chapters pages on Meta so they are updated once a year
* format for chapter reports: ** Revenues ** Expenses ** Activities ** Members
* http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Documentation/Inter...
== Group Photo == * http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wikimedia_Conference_2011_group_photo...
That's it with the summary of the chapters meeting. All members are invited to participate in the processes and discussions on Meta.
Best regards,
Well, uhm, Oscar was attending different sessions from me, so I have a different point of view of what I digested from the Conference. I managed to write down some draft report in the airport and in the plane, and I am still compiling the notes. Pardon my laziness, but I hope that I'll have published it by tomorrow.
------------------------------------- Abbas Mahmood t | +254722215101 f | www.facebook.com/abbasjnr s | abbasjnr Wikimedia Kenya Member
"Imagine a world in which every single person on the planet is given free access to the sum of all human knowledge. That's our commitment."
Please donate: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate/Now/en
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:08:11 +0300 From: oslimoke@gmail.com To: wikimediake@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: [Wikimedia Kenya] Wikimedia Conference Summary
Dear all,
last weekend the annual Chapters Meeting took place in Berlin. Each year two representatives of each Wikimedia chapter meet there. During the
meeting South Africa was recognized as the first african chapter. Wikimedia CH and Austria have been represented by Manuel Schneider and Kurt Kulac. With this report we'd like to share our experiences with the
Wikimedia community. Additionally all sessions have been logged and published on Meta: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Documentation
A short TV report on the meeting for ARD Tagesschau (in german) can be viewed online: http://www.tagesschau.de/multimedia/video/sendungsbeitrag101886_res-.html
== Current State of the Chapters == Traditionally each chapter meeting starts with a three minute report of each chapter about their current state: Members, budget, past and future projects, good and bad experiences.
Most of the "State of the Chapter" presentations have been linked on Meta: * http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Schedule#State_of_t...
* http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Schedule#State_of_t...
* WMCH: http://wikimedia.ch/State_of_the_Chapter_2011 * WMAT: http://mitglieder.wikimedia.at/Archiv/2011-03-26_State_of_the_Chapter
== Fundraising Summit == There will be again a Fundraising Summit for all chapters participating in the Wikimedia Fundraiser by the end of the year. This year's summit will be organised in June by Wikimedia Österreich.
* http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fundraising_2011/Fundraising_Summit
== Movement Roles ==
There are the Wikimedia Foundation and Wikimedia Chapters as branches of the Foundation, but there are also other entities and organisations withing the Wikiverse. While the relationship between Foundation and chapters has been settled by the chapters agreement there are many open
questions in how to handle other organisations which are not chapters.
A "Movement Roles Working Group" has been set up a year ago that is researching this topic. Recently surveys have been sent out to chapter
people (I have forwarded them to the respective boards) and a public survey is planned to be published soon.
All members and inhabitants of the Wikiverse are urged to participate in this process, to shape the roles of chapters, foundation and their own.
* http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_roles_project * http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_roles_project/New_group_models
* http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_roles_project/Sue_Gardner%27s_input_...
* http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Documentation/Movem...
== Collaborations with Galeries, Libraries, Archives and Museums (GLAMs) == The other chapters have presented their experiences with talking to GLAMs. In many countries discussions and talks happen and GLAMs are
willing to cooperate, but a there is little visible output.
The Wiki Loves Monuments project interacts here, aiming to be a pan-european project to define, list and illustrate all monuments throughout Europe. Ideas are currently being discussed, WMAT started
talking to the administration bodies taking care of monuments, lists need to be digitized and unified. A photo competition and reimbursement of travel costs should foster the communities will to take good pictures
of all monuments. WMNL has been able to get sitenotices up to attract more people for the project. Other ideas are to provide extensive amounts of swag, such as sticker, pins, T-Shirts etc.
* http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Documentation/Worki...
* http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Documentation/GLAM_...
== Hiring Employees == Many chapters - as Wikimedia Austria and Switzerland - have been thinking about hiring employees or to outsource work to paid people. Many projects are time-intensive and participating at the Wikimedia
Fundraiser is hard to be handled on a volunteer basis due to the high amount of donations which need to be booked correctly, thanked and reported.
Several times statements like "Wikimedia chapters are no fan clubs" have
been made. Conclusion: Wikimedia chapters are primarily administrative organisations which enable volunteers to do their work better and "enable others to be fan-clubs". With the needed professionalisation of
the chapters their boards change from executive to overseeing committees. Along with this it is important to transfer (seed) the enthusiasm by the board members into the director / manager of the chapters office.
A few chapters have already stepped forward by applying different strategies:
* WMDE: "Management Approach" - They hired an employee that can manage himself and is looking for new tasks and implemented them on his own.
This is important as management and monitoring of employees - which is also a big effort - can be minimised. A good manager can also fund himself by finding new opportunities and is able to find new employees to support him as the work load increases, a scalable solution.
A manager writes proposals which the board will review and decide. By that the board actually gets more power as it can act strategically rather than ad-hoc under pressure of daily tasks.
* WMPL: "Outsourcing" - legally neccessary tasks have been outsourced
early. Problem: different people for different tasks which do not know each other and do not act strategically. WMPL: "...in the end we had an accountant, but nobody had time to bring her the receipts so she could
do her work."
New approach: Hire someone who can do different things on his own and have him sit in the WMPL office.
* Office space: Rent offices teogether with other "lime-minded organisations", such as the parlamentarian group digital sustainability,
Free Software Foundation Europe, Swiss Unix Usergroup, Creative Commons...
* Job profiles: Look at what the other chapters have done, for instance the "office manager" of WMUK who has handled the fundraiser.
* If you develop your organisation then get a "manager type" of employee. * If you only need a service center for your administrative tasks then outsource it.
* Selection of emplyees: It is helpful if the employee is a Wikimedian
but this is not the qualification you are looking for. If you have to choose between a manager which is not a Wikimedian and a Wikimedian which is not a manager, choose the manager (Pavel, WMDE).
* Managing remotely is extremely hard. It takes longer to find out if
something goes into the wrong direction (Thierry, WMFR). A manager will also manage itself.
* An employee should have one or at max two bosses and not the board as a boss. Otherwise it takes too longe to make management decision.
* At least a weekly Skype meeting is recommended, the verbal contact is very important rather than writing e-mails.
* Application process (WMFR): ** received 40 applications, two filters: eight left. These eight
applicants have been interviewed by eight people from the board and involved members. ** a Wikimedian has the advantage that you already know him and how he works. But be careful with "super members", there is the risk of leading
into demotivation and problems. It is sometimes better to employ someone from the outside.
Invitation by Pavel (WMDE): "We have gained a lot of experience. Just come a week to Berlin and look how I deal with it."
* http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Documentation/Profe...
== openZIM (Wikipedia Offline) == The ZIM libraries have been recently included into the book printing funtion - now everyone can easily create ZIM files from the Wikis.
To make the code and the work on it more visible it should be
transferred to svn.wikimedia.org. Each commit is sent to IRC and mailinglist, also many developers have a copy of that repository so the
hurdle to look into the code and work with it is much lower.
== Internal Organisation / Roles within the Chapters == Several sessions dealt with the tasks withing the chapters or the motivation of members. We agreed on the following types of members:
* proactive (they initiate things and do work on their own) * active (they are active when being asked) * inactive * counter-active (trolls)
The goal is to convert inactive members to active members and active to
proactive. Trolls are part of the ecosystem and sometimes have a corrective function. In doubt when there is to much hassle nobody should hesitate to exclude them from the chapter.
* Each organisation needs to fill in four functions - of which a single
person can at max. fill in three: ** Production (get things done) ** Administration (organisation) ** Innovation (new ideas, development) ** Integration (people person)
* Convert members to active members:
** often it helps to contact people directly and personally - often nobody responds on mailinglists ** keep a list of tasks in your chapters wiki to give interested people a hint where they can start working on. Ask on your members on the
mailinglist to sign up for these tasks.
* Each board should consist of the following positions: ** people person, social integrator ** secretary / administrator ** contact person for the community - must have a good standing inside
the Wikimedia projects before becoming a board member
* http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Documentation/Volun...
== Communication == Different chapters communicate in different ways. The suggested monthly report is provided by a small number of chapters only (WMCH: No report since a long time). There has been a lot of discussion on the effort
needed in writing those reports and the possibility to re-use them. Many chapters write blog posts, others communicate on Twitter or Facebook, usually in their own language. Other chapters have no benefit from that
and can't learn from each other or simply know what is going on in the Wikiverse.
The following solution was agreed on: * each chapter should have a blog and post there regularly ** messages for other chapters should be tagged with "chapter"
** all chapter blogs should be aggregate by two Wikimedia planets: *** there are already Wikimedia planets for different languages *** a new Wikimedia planet for chapters (all languages) should be created ** link your blogs with social networks to make your posts to appear there:
*** Twitter *** Facebook
* publish interesting news also on the Wikimedia SignPost
* monthly newsletter to the members ** newsletter can be prepared publicly on the chapters wiki, so everyone can contribute his or her project
** one person writes a summary of what is going on at Wikimedia
* print hand outs or even bulletings when you have conferences or assemblies ** handouts should always be available ** get an ISSN for bulletins to make your publications more visible
* a template for the chapters report should hold the minimal information needed by the Wikimedia Foundation ** this template will be published on Meta ** the state of the chapter presentations will have the minimal
information, they should go directly to the chapters pages on Meta so they are updated once a year
* format for chapter reports: ** Revenues ** Expenses ** Activities ** Members
* http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Documentation/Inter...
== Group Photo == * http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wikimedia_Conference_2011_group_photo...
That's it with the summary of the chapters meeting. All members are invited to participate in the processes and discussions on Meta.
Best regards,
Now I know for real we had true representatives!!!! Congraturations guys, and congrats too to our Brothers in South Africa. Definitely we are on the line now, that means we gotta increase our activity to the optimum. I am still digesting Oscar's report, and necessary links will be beautifull incorporated in Wikimedia Kenya http://www.wikimedia.or.ke in case they haven't yet been incorporated.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Abbas Mahmood abbasjnr@hotmail.com wrote:
Well, uhm, Oscar was attending different sessions from me, so I have a different point of view of what I digested from the Conference. I managed to write down some draft report in the airport and in the plane, and I am still compiling the notes. Pardon my laziness, but I hope that I'll have published it by tomorrow.
-------------------------------------Abbas Mahmood t | +254722215101 f | www.facebook.com/abbasjnr s | abbasjnr Wikimedia Kenya Member
"*Imagine a world in which every single person on the planet is given free access to the sum of all human knowledge. That's our commitment."* ** Please donate: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate/Now/en
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:08:11 +0300 From: oslimoke@gmail.com To: wikimediake@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: [Wikimedia Kenya] Wikimedia Conference Summary
Dear all,
last weekend the annual Chapters Meeting took place in Berlin. Each year two representatives of each Wikimedia chapter meet there. During the meeting South Africa was recognized as the first african chapter. Wikimedia CH and Austria have been represented by Manuel Schneider and Kurt Kulac. With this report we'd like to share our experiences with the Wikimedia community. Additionally all sessions have been logged and published on Meta: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Documentation
A short TV report on the meeting for ARD Tagesschau (in german) can be viewed online: http://www.tagesschau.de/multimedia/video/sendungsbeitrag101886_res-.html
== Current State of the Chapters == Traditionally each chapter meeting starts with a three minute report of each chapter about their current state: Members, budget, past and future projects, good and bad experiences.
Most of the "State of the Chapter" presentations have been linked on Meta:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Schedule#State_of_t...
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Schedule#State_of_t...
- WMCH: http://wikimedia.ch/State_of_the_Chapter_2011
- WMAT:
http://mitglieder.wikimedia.at/Archiv/2011-03-26_State_of_the_Chapter
== Fundraising Summit == There will be again a Fundraising Summit for all chapters participating in the Wikimedia Fundraiser by the end of the year. This year's summit will be organised in June by Wikimedia Österreich.
== Movement Roles == There are the Wikimedia Foundation and Wikimedia Chapters as branches of the Foundation, but there are also other entities and organisations withing the Wikiverse. While the relationship between Foundation and chapters has been settled by the chapters agreement there are many open questions in how to handle other organisations which are not chapters.
A "Movement Roles Working Group" has been set up a year ago that is researching this topic. Recently surveys have been sent out to chapter people (I have forwarded them to the respective boards) and a public survey is planned to be published soon.
All members and inhabitants of the Wikiverse are urged to participate in this process, to shape the roles of chapters, foundation and their own.
- http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_roles_project
- http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_roles_project/New_group_models
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_roles_project/Sue_Gardner%27s_input_...
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Documentation/Movem...
== Collaborations with Galeries, Libraries, Archives and Museums (GLAMs) == The other chapters have presented their experiences with talking to GLAMs. In many countries discussions and talks happen and GLAMs are willing to cooperate, but a there is little visible output.
The Wiki Loves Monuments project interacts here, aiming to be a pan-european project to define, list and illustrate all monuments throughout Europe. Ideas are currently being discussed, WMAT started talking to the administration bodies taking care of monuments, lists need to be digitized and unified. A photo competition and reimbursement of travel costs should foster the communities will to take good pictures of all monuments. WMNL has been able to get sitenotices up to attract more people for the project. Other ideas are to provide extensive amounts of swag, such as sticker, pins, T-Shirts etc.
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Documentation/Worki...
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Documentation/GLAM_...
== Hiring Employees == Many chapters - as Wikimedia Austria and Switzerland - have been thinking about hiring employees or to outsource work to paid people. Many projects are time-intensive and participating at the Wikimedia Fundraiser is hard to be handled on a volunteer basis due to the high amount of donations which need to be booked correctly, thanked and reported.
Several times statements like "Wikimedia chapters are no fan clubs" have been made. Conclusion: Wikimedia chapters are primarily administrative organisations which enable volunteers to do their work better and "enable others to be fan-clubs". With the needed professionalisation of the chapters their boards change from executive to overseeing committees. Along with this it is important to transfer (seed) the enthusiasm by the board members into the director / manager of the chapters office.
A few chapters have already stepped forward by applying different strategies:
- WMDE: "Management Approach" - They hired an employee that can manage
himself and is looking for new tasks and implemented them on his own. This is important as management and monitoring of employees - which is also a big effort - can be minimised. A good manager can also fund himself by finding new opportunities and is able to find new employees to support him as the work load increases, a scalable solution.
A manager writes proposals which the board will review and decide. By that the board actually gets more power as it can act strategically rather than ad-hoc under pressure of daily tasks.
- WMPL: "Outsourcing" - legally neccessary tasks have been outsourced
early. Problem: different people for different tasks which do not know each other and do not act strategically. WMPL: "...in the end we had an accountant, but nobody had time to bring her the receipts so she could do her work."
New approach: Hire someone who can do different things on his own and have him sit in the WMPL office.
- Office space: Rent offices teogether with other "lime-minded
organisations", such as the parlamentarian group digital sustainability, Free Software Foundation Europe, Swiss Unix Usergroup, Creative Commons...
- Job profiles: Look at what the other chapters have done, for instance
the "office manager" of WMUK who has handled the fundraiser.
- If you develop your organisation then get a "manager type" of employee.
- If you only need a service center for your administrative tasks then
outsource it.
- Selection of emplyees: It is helpful if the employee is a Wikimedian
but this is not the qualification you are looking for. If you have to choose between a manager which is not a Wikimedian and a Wikimedian which is not a manager, choose the manager (Pavel, WMDE).
- Managing remotely is extremely hard. It takes longer to find out if
something goes into the wrong direction (Thierry, WMFR). A manager will also manage itself.
- An employee should have one or at max two bosses and not the board as
a boss. Otherwise it takes too longe to make management decision.
- At least a weekly Skype meeting is recommended, the verbal contact is
very important rather than writing e-mails.
- Application process (WMFR):
** received 40 applications, two filters: eight left. These eight applicants have been interviewed by eight people from the board and involved members. ** a Wikimedian has the advantage that you already know him and how he works. But be careful with "super members", there is the risk of leading into demotivation and problems. It is sometimes better to employ someone from the outside.
Invitation by Pavel (WMDE): "We have gained a lot of experience. Just come a week to Berlin and look how I deal with it."
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Documentation/Profe...
== openZIM (Wikipedia Offline) == The ZIM libraries have been recently included into the book printing funtion - now everyone can easily create ZIM files from the Wikis.
To make the code and the work on it more visible it should be transferred to svn.wikimedia.org. Each commit is sent to IRC and mailinglist, also many developers have a copy of that repository so the hurdle to look into the code and work with it is much lower.
== Internal Organisation / Roles within the Chapters == Several sessions dealt with the tasks withing the chapters or the motivation of members. We agreed on the following types of members:
- proactive (they initiate things and do work on their own)
- active (they are active when being asked)
- inactive
- counter-active (trolls)
The goal is to convert inactive members to active members and active to proactive. Trolls are part of the ecosystem and sometimes have a corrective function. In doubt when there is to much hassle nobody should hesitate to exclude them from the chapter.
- Each organisation needs to fill in four functions - of which a single
person can at max. fill in three: ** Production (get things done) ** Administration (organisation) ** Innovation (new ideas, development) ** Integration (people person)
- Convert members to active members:
** often it helps to contact people directly and personally - often nobody responds on mailinglists ** keep a list of tasks in your chapters wiki to give interested people a hint where they can start working on. Ask on your members on the mailinglist to sign up for these tasks.
- Each board should consist of the following positions:
** people person, social integrator ** secretary / administrator ** contact person for the community - must have a good standing inside the Wikimedia projects before becoming a board member
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Documentation/Volun...
== Communication == Different chapters communicate in different ways. The suggested monthly report is provided by a small number of chapters only (WMCH: No report since a long time). There has been a lot of discussion on the effort needed in writing those reports and the possibility to re-use them. Many chapters write blog posts, others communicate on Twitter or Facebook, usually in their own language. Other chapters have no benefit from that and can't learn from each other or simply know what is going on in the Wikiverse.
The following solution was agreed on:
- each chapter should have a blog and post there regularly
** messages for other chapters should be tagged with "chapter" ** all chapter blogs should be aggregate by two Wikimedia planets: *** there are already Wikimedia planets for different languages *** a new Wikimedia planet for chapters (all languages) should be created ** link your blogs with social networks to make your posts to appear there: *** Twitter *** Facebook
publish interesting news also on the Wikimedia SignPost
monthly newsletter to the members
** newsletter can be prepared publicly on the chapters wiki, so everyone can contribute his or her project ** one person writes a summary of what is going on at Wikimedia
- print hand outs or even bulletings when you have conferences or
assemblies ** handouts should always be available ** get an ISSN for bulletins to make your publications more visible
- a template for the chapters report should hold the minimal information
needed by the Wikimedia Foundation ** this template will be published on Meta ** the state of the chapter presentations will have the minimal information, they should go directly to the chapters pages on Meta so they are updated once a year
- format for chapter reports:
** Revenues ** Expenses ** Activities ** Members
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Documentation/Inter...
== Group Photo ==
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wikimedia_Conference_2011_group_photo...
That's it with the summary of the chapters meeting. All members are invited to participate in the processes and discussions on Meta.
Best regards,
-- Limoke Oscar,
p/s:this report was prepared by Manuel.
_______________________________________________ WikimediaKE mailing list WikimediaKE@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediake
WikimediaKE mailing list WikimediaKE@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediake
Abbas,I have not compiled my own report too.i just shared Manuel;s point of view to keep the group looped in on the general happenings.i will be adding my Point of view in the sessions that i attended in the report soon too. thanks Sam,we learnt lots of things but most importantly is the fact that the world was so "PLEASED" with what and how we do our things....so lets keep it up.
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 8:58 AM, SAMSON MAOSA coolsam726@gmail.com wrote:
Now I know for real we had true representatives!!!! Congraturations guys, and congrats too to our Brothers in South Africa. Definitely we are on the line now, that means we gotta increase our activity to the optimum. I am still digesting Oscar's report, and necessary links will be beautifull incorporated in Wikimedia Kenya http://www.wikimedia.or.ke in case they haven't yet been incorporated.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Abbas Mahmood abbasjnr@hotmail.comwrote:
Well, uhm, Oscar was attending different sessions from me, so I have a different point of view of what I digested from the Conference. I managed to write down some draft report in the airport and in the plane, and I am still compiling the notes. Pardon my laziness, but I hope that I'll have published it by tomorrow.
-------------------------------------Abbas Mahmood t | +254722215101 f | www.facebook.com/abbasjnr s | abbasjnr Wikimedia Kenya Member
"*Imagine a world in which every single person on the planet is given free access to the sum of all human knowledge. That's our commitment."* ** Please donate: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate/Now/en
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:08:11 +0300 From: oslimoke@gmail.com To: wikimediake@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: [Wikimedia Kenya] Wikimedia Conference Summary
Dear all,
last weekend the annual Chapters Meeting took place in Berlin. Each year two representatives of each Wikimedia chapter meet there. During the meeting South Africa was recognized as the first african chapter. Wikimedia CH and Austria have been represented by Manuel Schneider and Kurt Kulac. With this report we'd like to share our experiences with the Wikimedia community. Additionally all sessions have been logged and published on Meta: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Documentation
A short TV report on the meeting for ARD Tagesschau (in german) can be viewed online: http://www.tagesschau.de/multimedia/video/sendungsbeitrag101886_res-.html
== Current State of the Chapters == Traditionally each chapter meeting starts with a three minute report of each chapter about their current state: Members, budget, past and future projects, good and bad experiences.
Most of the "State of the Chapter" presentations have been linked on Meta:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Schedule#State_of_t...
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Schedule#State_of_t...
- WMCH: http://wikimedia.ch/State_of_the_Chapter_2011
- WMAT:
http://mitglieder.wikimedia.at/Archiv/2011-03-26_State_of_the_Chapter
== Fundraising Summit == There will be again a Fundraising Summit for all chapters participating in the Wikimedia Fundraiser by the end of the year. This year's summit will be organised in June by Wikimedia Österreich.
== Movement Roles == There are the Wikimedia Foundation and Wikimedia Chapters as branches of the Foundation, but there are also other entities and organisations withing the Wikiverse. While the relationship between Foundation and chapters has been settled by the chapters agreement there are many open questions in how to handle other organisations which are not chapters.
A "Movement Roles Working Group" has been set up a year ago that is researching this topic. Recently surveys have been sent out to chapter people (I have forwarded them to the respective boards) and a public survey is planned to be published soon.
All members and inhabitants of the Wikiverse are urged to participate in this process, to shape the roles of chapters, foundation and their own.
- http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_roles_project
- http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_roles_project/New_group_models
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_roles_project/Sue_Gardner%27s_input_...
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Documentation/Movem...
== Collaborations with Galeries, Libraries, Archives and Museums (GLAMs)
The other chapters have presented their experiences with talking to GLAMs. In many countries discussions and talks happen and GLAMs are willing to cooperate, but a there is little visible output.
The Wiki Loves Monuments project interacts here, aiming to be a pan-european project to define, list and illustrate all monuments throughout Europe. Ideas are currently being discussed, WMAT started talking to the administration bodies taking care of monuments, lists need to be digitized and unified. A photo competition and reimbursement of travel costs should foster the communities will to take good pictures of all monuments. WMNL has been able to get sitenotices up to attract more people for the project. Other ideas are to provide extensive amounts of swag, such as sticker, pins, T-Shirts etc.
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Documentation/Worki...
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Documentation/GLAM_...
== Hiring Employees == Many chapters - as Wikimedia Austria and Switzerland - have been thinking about hiring employees or to outsource work to paid people. Many projects are time-intensive and participating at the Wikimedia Fundraiser is hard to be handled on a volunteer basis due to the high amount of donations which need to be booked correctly, thanked and reported.
Several times statements like "Wikimedia chapters are no fan clubs" have been made. Conclusion: Wikimedia chapters are primarily administrative organisations which enable volunteers to do their work better and "enable others to be fan-clubs". With the needed professionalisation of the chapters their boards change from executive to overseeing committees. Along with this it is important to transfer (seed) the enthusiasm by the board members into the director / manager of the chapters office.
A few chapters have already stepped forward by applying different strategies:
- WMDE: "Management Approach" - They hired an employee that can manage
himself and is looking for new tasks and implemented them on his own. This is important as management and monitoring of employees - which is also a big effort - can be minimised. A good manager can also fund himself by finding new opportunities and is able to find new employees to support him as the work load increases, a scalable solution.
A manager writes proposals which the board will review and decide. By that the board actually gets more power as it can act strategically rather than ad-hoc under pressure of daily tasks.
- WMPL: "Outsourcing" - legally neccessary tasks have been outsourced
early. Problem: different people for different tasks which do not know each other and do not act strategically. WMPL: "...in the end we had an accountant, but nobody had time to bring her the receipts so she could do her work."
New approach: Hire someone who can do different things on his own and have him sit in the WMPL office.
- Office space: Rent offices teogether with other "lime-minded
organisations", such as the parlamentarian group digital sustainability, Free Software Foundation Europe, Swiss Unix Usergroup, Creative Commons...
- Job profiles: Look at what the other chapters have done, for instance
the "office manager" of WMUK who has handled the fundraiser.
- If you develop your organisation then get a "manager type" of employee.
- If you only need a service center for your administrative tasks then
outsource it.
- Selection of emplyees: It is helpful if the employee is a Wikimedian
but this is not the qualification you are looking for. If you have to choose between a manager which is not a Wikimedian and a Wikimedian which is not a manager, choose the manager (Pavel, WMDE).
- Managing remotely is extremely hard. It takes longer to find out if
something goes into the wrong direction (Thierry, WMFR). A manager will also manage itself.
- An employee should have one or at max two bosses and not the board as
a boss. Otherwise it takes too longe to make management decision.
- At least a weekly Skype meeting is recommended, the verbal contact is
very important rather than writing e-mails.
- Application process (WMFR):
** received 40 applications, two filters: eight left. These eight applicants have been interviewed by eight people from the board and involved members. ** a Wikimedian has the advantage that you already know him and how he works. But be careful with "super members", there is the risk of leading into demotivation and problems. It is sometimes better to employ someone from the outside.
Invitation by Pavel (WMDE): "We have gained a lot of experience. Just come a week to Berlin and look how I deal with it."
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Documentation/Profe...
== openZIM (Wikipedia Offline) == The ZIM libraries have been recently included into the book printing funtion - now everyone can easily create ZIM files from the Wikis.
To make the code and the work on it more visible it should be transferred to svn.wikimedia.org. Each commit is sent to IRC and mailinglist, also many developers have a copy of that repository so the hurdle to look into the code and work with it is much lower.
== Internal Organisation / Roles within the Chapters == Several sessions dealt with the tasks withing the chapters or the motivation of members. We agreed on the following types of members:
- proactive (they initiate things and do work on their own)
- active (they are active when being asked)
- inactive
- counter-active (trolls)
The goal is to convert inactive members to active members and active to proactive. Trolls are part of the ecosystem and sometimes have a corrective function. In doubt when there is to much hassle nobody should hesitate to exclude them from the chapter.
- Each organisation needs to fill in four functions - of which a single
person can at max. fill in three: ** Production (get things done) ** Administration (organisation) ** Innovation (new ideas, development) ** Integration (people person)
- Convert members to active members:
** often it helps to contact people directly and personally - often nobody responds on mailinglists ** keep a list of tasks in your chapters wiki to give interested people a hint where they can start working on. Ask on your members on the mailinglist to sign up for these tasks.
- Each board should consist of the following positions:
** people person, social integrator ** secretary / administrator ** contact person for the community - must have a good standing inside the Wikimedia projects before becoming a board member
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Documentation/Volun...
== Communication == Different chapters communicate in different ways. The suggested monthly report is provided by a small number of chapters only (WMCH: No report since a long time). There has been a lot of discussion on the effort needed in writing those reports and the possibility to re-use them. Many chapters write blog posts, others communicate on Twitter or Facebook, usually in their own language. Other chapters have no benefit from that and can't learn from each other or simply know what is going on in the Wikiverse.
The following solution was agreed on:
- each chapter should have a blog and post there regularly
** messages for other chapters should be tagged with "chapter" ** all chapter blogs should be aggregate by two Wikimedia planets: *** there are already Wikimedia planets for different languages *** a new Wikimedia planet for chapters (all languages) should be created ** link your blogs with social networks to make your posts to appear there: *** Twitter *** Facebook
publish interesting news also on the Wikimedia SignPost
monthly newsletter to the members
** newsletter can be prepared publicly on the chapters wiki, so everyone can contribute his or her project ** one person writes a summary of what is going on at Wikimedia
- print hand outs or even bulletings when you have conferences or
assemblies ** handouts should always be available ** get an ISSN for bulletins to make your publications more visible
- a template for the chapters report should hold the minimal information
needed by the Wikimedia Foundation ** this template will be published on Meta ** the state of the chapter presentations will have the minimal information, they should go directly to the chapters pages on Meta so they are updated once a year
- format for chapter reports:
** Revenues ** Expenses ** Activities ** Members
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Documentation/Inter...
== Group Photo ==
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wikimedia_Conference_2011_group_photo...
That's it with the summary of the chapters meeting. All members are invited to participate in the processes and discussions on Meta.
Best regards,
-- Limoke Oscar,
p/s:this report was prepared by Manuel.
_______________________________________________ WikimediaKE mailing list WikimediaKE@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediake
WikimediaKE mailing list WikimediaKE@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediake
--
Samson Arosi Maosa, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Bsc. Electronics and Computer Engineering +254750-nine-one-seven-three-zero-five *"In this world, everything has been done but suppose we try doing it in a different (better) way?"* Make someone know what you already know. Join us now at Wikimedia Kenyahttp://www.wikimedia.or.ke
WikimediaKE mailing list WikimediaKE@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediake
Very encouraging
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Limoke Oscar oslimoke@gmail.com wrote:
Abbas,I have not compiled my own report too.i just shared Manuel;s point of view to keep the group looped in on the general happenings.i will be adding my Point of view in the sessions that i attended in the report soon too. thanks Sam,we learnt lots of things but most importantly is the fact that the world was so "PLEASED" with what and how we do our things....so lets keep it up.
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 8:58 AM, SAMSON MAOSA coolsam726@gmail.comwrote:
Now I know for real we had true representatives!!!! Congraturations guys, and congrats too to our Brothers in South Africa. Definitely we are on the line now, that means we gotta increase our activity to the optimum. I am still digesting Oscar's report, and necessary links will be beautifull incorporated in Wikimedia Kenya http://www.wikimedia.or.ke in case they haven't yet been incorporated.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Abbas Mahmood abbasjnr@hotmail.comwrote:
Well, uhm, Oscar was attending different sessions from me, so I have a different point of view of what I digested from the Conference. I managed to write down some draft report in the airport and in the plane, and I am still compiling the notes. Pardon my laziness, but I hope that I'll have published it by tomorrow.
-------------------------------------Abbas Mahmood t | +254722215101 f | www.facebook.com/abbasjnr s | abbasjnr Wikimedia Kenya Member
"*Imagine a world in which every single person on the planet is given free access to the sum of all human knowledge. That's our commitment."* ** Please donate: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate/Now/en
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:08:11 +0300 From: oslimoke@gmail.com To: wikimediake@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: [Wikimedia Kenya] Wikimedia Conference Summary
Dear all,
last weekend the annual Chapters Meeting took place in Berlin. Each year two representatives of each Wikimedia chapter meet there. During the meeting South Africa was recognized as the first african chapter. Wikimedia CH and Austria have been represented by Manuel Schneider and Kurt Kulac. With this report we'd like to share our experiences with the Wikimedia community. Additionally all sessions have been logged and published on Meta: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Documentation
A short TV report on the meeting for ARD Tagesschau (in german) can be viewed online: http://www.tagesschau.de/multimedia/video/sendungsbeitrag101886_res-.html
== Current State of the Chapters == Traditionally each chapter meeting starts with a three minute report of each chapter about their current state: Members, budget, past and future projects, good and bad experiences.
Most of the "State of the Chapter" presentations have been linked on Meta:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Schedule#State_of_t...
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Schedule#State_of_t...
- WMCH: http://wikimedia.ch/State_of_the_Chapter_2011
- WMAT:
http://mitglieder.wikimedia.at/Archiv/2011-03-26_State_of_the_Chapter
== Fundraising Summit == There will be again a Fundraising Summit for all chapters participating in the Wikimedia Fundraiser by the end of the year. This year's summit will be organised in June by Wikimedia Österreich.
== Movement Roles == There are the Wikimedia Foundation and Wikimedia Chapters as branches of the Foundation, but there are also other entities and organisations withing the Wikiverse. While the relationship between Foundation and chapters has been settled by the chapters agreement there are many open questions in how to handle other organisations which are not chapters.
A "Movement Roles Working Group" has been set up a year ago that is researching this topic. Recently surveys have been sent out to chapter people (I have forwarded them to the respective boards) and a public survey is planned to be published soon.
All members and inhabitants of the Wikiverse are urged to participate in this process, to shape the roles of chapters, foundation and their own.
- http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_roles_project
- http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_roles_project/New_group_models
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_roles_project/Sue_Gardner%27s_input_...
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Documentation/Movem...
== Collaborations with Galeries, Libraries, Archives and Museums (GLAMs)
The other chapters have presented their experiences with talking to GLAMs. In many countries discussions and talks happen and GLAMs are willing to cooperate, but a there is little visible output.
The Wiki Loves Monuments project interacts here, aiming to be a pan-european project to define, list and illustrate all monuments throughout Europe. Ideas are currently being discussed, WMAT started talking to the administration bodies taking care of monuments, lists need to be digitized and unified. A photo competition and reimbursement of travel costs should foster the communities will to take good pictures of all monuments. WMNL has been able to get sitenotices up to attract more people for the project. Other ideas are to provide extensive amounts of swag, such as sticker, pins, T-Shirts etc.
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Documentation/Worki...
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Documentation/GLAM_...
== Hiring Employees == Many chapters - as Wikimedia Austria and Switzerland - have been thinking about hiring employees or to outsource work to paid people. Many projects are time-intensive and participating at the Wikimedia Fundraiser is hard to be handled on a volunteer basis due to the high amount of donations which need to be booked correctly, thanked and reported.
Several times statements like "Wikimedia chapters are no fan clubs" have been made. Conclusion: Wikimedia chapters are primarily administrative organisations which enable volunteers to do their work better and "enable others to be fan-clubs". With the needed professionalisation of the chapters their boards change from executive to overseeing committees. Along with this it is important to transfer (seed) the enthusiasm by the board members into the director / manager of the chapters office.
A few chapters have already stepped forward by applying different strategies:
- WMDE: "Management Approach" - They hired an employee that can manage
himself and is looking for new tasks and implemented them on his own. This is important as management and monitoring of employees - which is also a big effort - can be minimised. A good manager can also fund himself by finding new opportunities and is able to find new employees to support him as the work load increases, a scalable solution.
A manager writes proposals which the board will review and decide. By that the board actually gets more power as it can act strategically rather than ad-hoc under pressure of daily tasks.
- WMPL: "Outsourcing" - legally neccessary tasks have been outsourced
early. Problem: different people for different tasks which do not know each other and do not act strategically. WMPL: "...in the end we had an accountant, but nobody had time to bring her the receipts so she could do her work."
New approach: Hire someone who can do different things on his own and have him sit in the WMPL office.
- Office space: Rent offices teogether with other "lime-minded
organisations", such as the parlamentarian group digital sustainability, Free Software Foundation Europe, Swiss Unix Usergroup, Creative Commons...
- Job profiles: Look at what the other chapters have done, for instance
the "office manager" of WMUK who has handled the fundraiser.
- If you develop your organisation then get a "manager type" of employee.
- If you only need a service center for your administrative tasks then
outsource it.
- Selection of emplyees: It is helpful if the employee is a Wikimedian
but this is not the qualification you are looking for. If you have to choose between a manager which is not a Wikimedian and a Wikimedian which is not a manager, choose the manager (Pavel, WMDE).
- Managing remotely is extremely hard. It takes longer to find out if
something goes into the wrong direction (Thierry, WMFR). A manager will also manage itself.
- An employee should have one or at max two bosses and not the board as
a boss. Otherwise it takes too longe to make management decision.
- At least a weekly Skype meeting is recommended, the verbal contact is
very important rather than writing e-mails.
- Application process (WMFR):
** received 40 applications, two filters: eight left. These eight applicants have been interviewed by eight people from the board and involved members. ** a Wikimedian has the advantage that you already know him and how he works. But be careful with "super members", there is the risk of leading into demotivation and problems. It is sometimes better to employ someone from the outside.
Invitation by Pavel (WMDE): "We have gained a lot of experience. Just come a week to Berlin and look how I deal with it."
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Documentation/Profe...
== openZIM (Wikipedia Offline) == The ZIM libraries have been recently included into the book printing funtion - now everyone can easily create ZIM files from the Wikis.
To make the code and the work on it more visible it should be transferred to svn.wikimedia.org. Each commit is sent to IRC and mailinglist, also many developers have a copy of that repository so the hurdle to look into the code and work with it is much lower.
== Internal Organisation / Roles within the Chapters == Several sessions dealt with the tasks withing the chapters or the motivation of members. We agreed on the following types of members:
- proactive (they initiate things and do work on their own)
- active (they are active when being asked)
- inactive
- counter-active (trolls)
The goal is to convert inactive members to active members and active to proactive. Trolls are part of the ecosystem and sometimes have a corrective function. In doubt when there is to much hassle nobody should hesitate to exclude them from the chapter.
- Each organisation needs to fill in four functions - of which a single
person can at max. fill in three: ** Production (get things done) ** Administration (organisation) ** Innovation (new ideas, development) ** Integration (people person)
- Convert members to active members:
** often it helps to contact people directly and personally - often nobody responds on mailinglists ** keep a list of tasks in your chapters wiki to give interested people a hint where they can start working on. Ask on your members on the mailinglist to sign up for these tasks.
- Each board should consist of the following positions:
** people person, social integrator ** secretary / administrator ** contact person for the community - must have a good standing inside the Wikimedia projects before becoming a board member
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Documentation/Volun...
== Communication == Different chapters communicate in different ways. The suggested monthly report is provided by a small number of chapters only (WMCH: No report since a long time). There has been a lot of discussion on the effort needed in writing those reports and the possibility to re-use them. Many chapters write blog posts, others communicate on Twitter or Facebook, usually in their own language. Other chapters have no benefit from that and can't learn from each other or simply know what is going on in the Wikiverse.
The following solution was agreed on:
- each chapter should have a blog and post there regularly
** messages for other chapters should be tagged with "chapter" ** all chapter blogs should be aggregate by two Wikimedia planets: *** there are already Wikimedia planets for different languages *** a new Wikimedia planet for chapters (all languages) should be created ** link your blogs with social networks to make your posts to appear there: *** Twitter *** Facebook
publish interesting news also on the Wikimedia SignPost
monthly newsletter to the members
** newsletter can be prepared publicly on the chapters wiki, so everyone can contribute his or her project ** one person writes a summary of what is going on at Wikimedia
- print hand outs or even bulletings when you have conferences or
assemblies ** handouts should always be available ** get an ISSN for bulletins to make your publications more visible
- a template for the chapters report should hold the minimal information
needed by the Wikimedia Foundation ** this template will be published on Meta ** the state of the chapter presentations will have the minimal information, they should go directly to the chapters pages on Meta so they are updated once a year
- format for chapter reports:
** Revenues ** Expenses ** Activities ** Members
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Documentation/Inter...
== Group Photo ==
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wikimedia_Conference_2011_group_photo...
That's it with the summary of the chapters meeting. All members are invited to participate in the processes and discussions on Meta.
Best regards,
-- Limoke Oscar,
p/s:this report was prepared by Manuel.
_______________________________________________ WikimediaKE mailing list WikimediaKE@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediake
WikimediaKE mailing list WikimediaKE@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediake
--
Samson Arosi Maosa, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Bsc. Electronics and Computer Engineering +254750-nine-one-seven-three-zero-five *"In this world, everything has been done but suppose we try doing it in a different (better) way?"* Make someone know what you already know. Join us now at Wikimedia Kenyahttp://www.wikimedia.or.ke
WikimediaKE mailing list WikimediaKE@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediake
-- Limoke Oscar, Freelancer, GeoInformatics and GIScience Student
WikimediaKE mailing list WikimediaKE@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediake
Yeah I know you copy-pasted Manuel's report: I'm on the Wmcon list as well :P
------------------------------------- Abbas Mahmood t | +254722215101 f | www.facebook.com/abbasjnr s | abbasjnr Wikimedia Kenya Member
"Imagine a world in which every single person on the planet is given free access to the sum of all human knowledge. That's our commitment."
Please donate: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate/Now/en
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 10:08:28 +0300 From: oslimoke@gmail.com To: wikimediake@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Wikimedia Kenya] Wikimedia Conference Summary
Abbas,I have not compiled my own report too.i just shared Manuel;s point of view to keep the group looped in on the general happenings.i will be adding my Point of view in the sessions that i attended in the report soon too. thanks Sam,we learnt lots of things but most importantly is the fact that the world was so "PLEASED" with what and how we do our things....so lets keep it up.
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 8:58 AM, SAMSON MAOSA coolsam726@gmail.com wrote:
Now I know for real we had true representatives!!!! Congraturations guys, and congrats too to our Brothers in South Africa. Definitely we are on the line now, that means we gotta increase our activity to the optimum. I am still digesting Oscar's report, and necessary links will be beautifull incorporated in Wikimedia Kenya in case they haven't yet been incorporated.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Abbas Mahmood abbasjnr@hotmail.com wrote:
Well, uhm, Oscar was attending different sessions from me, so I have a different point of view of what I digested from the Conference. I managed to write down some draft report in the airport and in the plane, and I am still compiling the notes. Pardon my laziness, but I hope that I'll have published it by tomorrow.
------------------------------------- Abbas Mahmood t | +254722215101 f | www.facebook.com/abbasjnr s | abbasjnr Wikimedia Kenya Member
"Imagine a world in which every single person on the planet is given free access to the sum of all human knowledge. That's our commitment."
Please donate: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate/Now/en
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:08:11 +0300 From: oslimoke@gmail.com To: wikimediake@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: [Wikimedia Kenya] Wikimedia Conference Summary
Dear all,
last weekend the annual Chapters Meeting took place in Berlin. Each year two representatives of each Wikimedia chapter meet there. During the meeting South Africa was recognized as the first african chapter. Wikimedia CH and Austria have been represented by Manuel Schneider and Kurt Kulac. With this report we'd like to share our experiences with the Wikimedia community. Additionally all sessions have been logged and published on Meta: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Documentation
A short TV report on the meeting for ARD Tagesschau (in german) can be viewed online: http://www.tagesschau.de/multimedia/video/sendungsbeitrag101886_res-.html
== Current State of the Chapters == Traditionally each chapter meeting starts with a three minute report of each chapter about their current state: Members, budget, past and future projects, good and bad experiences.
Most of the "State of the Chapter" presentations have been linked on Meta: * http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Schedule#State_of_t... * http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Schedule#State_of_t...
* WMCH: http://wikimedia.ch/State_of_the_Chapter_2011 * WMAT: http://mitglieder.wikimedia.at/Archiv/2011-03-26_State_of_the_Chapter
== Fundraising Summit == There will be again a Fundraising Summit for all chapters participating in the Wikimedia Fundraiser by the end of the year. This year's summit will be organised in June by Wikimedia Österreich.
* http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fundraising_2011/Fundraising_Summit
== Movement Roles == There are the Wikimedia Foundation and Wikimedia Chapters as branches of the Foundation, but there are also other entities and organisations withing the Wikiverse. While the relationship between Foundation and chapters has been settled by the chapters agreement there are many open questions in how to handle other organisations which are not chapters.
A "Movement Roles Working Group" has been set up a year ago that is researching this topic. Recently surveys have been sent out to chapter people (I have forwarded them to the respective boards) and a public survey is planned to be published soon.
All members and inhabitants of the Wikiverse are urged to participate in this process, to shape the roles of chapters, foundation and their own.
* http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_roles_project * http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_roles_project/New_group_models * http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_roles_project/Sue_Gardner%27s_input_... * http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Documentation/Movem...
== Collaborations with Galeries, Libraries, Archives and Museums (GLAMs) == The other chapters have presented their experiences with talking to GLAMs. In many countries discussions and talks happen and GLAMs are willing to cooperate, but a there is little visible output.
The Wiki Loves Monuments project interacts here, aiming to be a pan-european project to define, list and illustrate all monuments throughout Europe. Ideas are currently being discussed, WMAT started talking to the administration bodies taking care of monuments, lists need to be digitized and unified. A photo competition and reimbursement of travel costs should foster the communities will to take good pictures of all monuments. WMNL has been able to get sitenotices up to attract more people for the project. Other ideas are to provide extensive amounts of swag, such as sticker, pins, T-Shirts etc.
* http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Documentation/Worki... * http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Documentation/GLAM_...
== Hiring Employees == Many chapters - as Wikimedia Austria and Switzerland - have been thinking about hiring employees or to outsource work to paid people. Many projects are time-intensive and participating at the Wikimedia Fundraiser is hard to be handled on a volunteer basis due to the high amount of donations which need to be booked correctly, thanked and reported.
Several times statements like "Wikimedia chapters are no fan clubs" have been made. Conclusion: Wikimedia chapters are primarily administrative organisations which enable volunteers to do their work better and "enable others to be fan-clubs". With the needed professionalisation of the chapters their boards change from executive to overseeing committees. Along with this it is important to transfer (seed) the enthusiasm by the board members into the director / manager of the chapters office.
A few chapters have already stepped forward by applying different strategies:
* WMDE: "Management Approach" - They hired an employee that can manage himself and is looking for new tasks and implemented them on his own. This is important as management and monitoring of employees - which is also a big effort - can be minimised. A good manager can also fund himself by finding new opportunities and is able to find new employees to support him as the work load increases, a scalable solution.
A manager writes proposals which the board will review and decide. By that the board actually gets more power as it can act strategically rather than ad-hoc under pressure of daily tasks.
* WMPL: "Outsourcing" - legally neccessary tasks have been outsourced early. Problem: different people for different tasks which do not know each other and do not act strategically. WMPL: "...in the end we had an accountant, but nobody had time to bring her the receipts so she could do her work."
New approach: Hire someone who can do different things on his own and have him sit in the WMPL office.
* Office space: Rent offices teogether with other "lime-minded organisations", such as the parlamentarian group digital sustainability, Free Software Foundation Europe, Swiss Unix Usergroup, Creative Commons...
* Job profiles: Look at what the other chapters have done, for instance the "office manager" of WMUK who has handled the fundraiser.
* If you develop your organisation then get a "manager type" of employee. * If you only need a service center for your administrative tasks then outsource it.
* Selection of emplyees: It is helpful if the employee is a Wikimedian but this is not the qualification you are looking for. If you have to choose between a manager which is not a Wikimedian and a Wikimedian which is not a manager, choose the manager (Pavel, WMDE).
* Managing remotely is extremely hard. It takes longer to find out if something goes into the wrong direction (Thierry, WMFR). A manager will also manage itself.
* An employee should have one or at max two bosses and not the board as a boss. Otherwise it takes too longe to make management decision.
* At least a weekly Skype meeting is recommended, the verbal contact is very important rather than writing e-mails.
* Application process (WMFR): ** received 40 applications, two filters: eight left. These eight applicants have been interviewed by eight people from the board and involved members. ** a Wikimedian has the advantage that you already know him and how he works. But be careful with "super members", there is the risk of leading into demotivation and problems. It is sometimes better to employ someone from the outside.
Invitation by Pavel (WMDE): "We have gained a lot of experience. Just come a week to Berlin and look how I deal with it."
* http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Documentation/Profe...
== openZIM (Wikipedia Offline) == The ZIM libraries have been recently included into the book printing funtion - now everyone can easily create ZIM files from the Wikis.
To make the code and the work on it more visible it should be transferred to svn.wikimedia.org. Each commit is sent to IRC and mailinglist, also many developers have a copy of that repository so the hurdle to look into the code and work with it is much lower.
== Internal Organisation / Roles within the Chapters == Several sessions dealt with the tasks withing the chapters or the motivation of members. We agreed on the following types of members: * proactive (they initiate things and do work on their own) * active (they are active when being asked) * inactive * counter-active (trolls)
The goal is to convert inactive members to active members and active to proactive. Trolls are part of the ecosystem and sometimes have a corrective function. In doubt when there is to much hassle nobody should hesitate to exclude them from the chapter.
* Each organisation needs to fill in four functions - of which a single person can at max. fill in three: ** Production (get things done) ** Administration (organisation) ** Innovation (new ideas, development) ** Integration (people person)
* Convert members to active members: ** often it helps to contact people directly and personally - often nobody responds on mailinglists ** keep a list of tasks in your chapters wiki to give interested people a hint where they can start working on. Ask on your members on the mailinglist to sign up for these tasks.
* Each board should consist of the following positions: ** people person, social integrator ** secretary / administrator ** contact person for the community - must have a good standing inside the Wikimedia projects before becoming a board member
* http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Documentation/Volun...
== Communication == Different chapters communicate in different ways. The suggested monthly report is provided by a small number of chapters only (WMCH: No report since a long time). There has been a lot of discussion on the effort needed in writing those reports and the possibility to re-use them. Many chapters write blog posts, others communicate on Twitter or Facebook, usually in their own language. Other chapters have no benefit from that and can't learn from each other or simply know what is going on in the Wikiverse.
The following solution was agreed on: * each chapter should have a blog and post there regularly ** messages for other chapters should be tagged with "chapter" ** all chapter blogs should be aggregate by two Wikimedia planets: *** there are already Wikimedia planets for different languages *** a new Wikimedia planet for chapters (all languages) should be created ** link your blogs with social networks to make your posts to appear there: *** Twitter *** Facebook
* publish interesting news also on the Wikimedia SignPost
* monthly newsletter to the members ** newsletter can be prepared publicly on the chapters wiki, so everyone can contribute his or her project ** one person writes a summary of what is going on at Wikimedia
* print hand outs or even bulletings when you have conferences or assemblies ** handouts should always be available ** get an ISSN for bulletins to make your publications more visible
* a template for the chapters report should hold the minimal information needed by the Wikimedia Foundation ** this template will be published on Meta ** the state of the chapter presentations will have the minimal information, they should go directly to the chapters pages on Meta so they are updated once a year
* format for chapter reports: ** Revenues ** Expenses ** Activities ** Members
* http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Documentation/Inter...
== Group Photo == * http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wikimedia_Conference_2011_group_photo...
That's it with the summary of the chapters meeting. All members are invited to participate in the processes and discussions on Meta.
Best regards,
wikimediake@lists.wikimedia.org