Hi,
just as input for the Discussion a little description of what WMNL has (in the end it is more important that there is a clear procedure than which procedure exactly): * If the vote is about a proposal and there is a tie, the proposal is not accepted. (50%+1 is required to accept something) Status quo is maintained. * If a vote is about people (and a decision is required) the vote is secret. If multiple people end on the same place, a second round will be held with the top-2. If they tie, fate will decide (throw a coin).
I don't say you have to use it, but it is just another option :)
Best regards,
Lodewijk
2011/6/30 Limoke Oscar oslimoke@gmail.com
Abbas,
I also think we should re-think what Stephen had suggested: regarding the tie-breaker. whether to opt for a tie-breaker or a re-election. The advantage of a re-election over a Chairman acting as a tie-breaker is
that
there wouldn't be any bad blood/grudge that can arise. Do you guys think
we
should change it as well?
I agree on that,lets do away with that to avoid the grudges.Perhaps in a re-run/election,people change minds and opinions...
WikimediaKE mailing list WikimediaKE@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediake