Thanks so much Adam! :). And thank you to Max for surfacing the issue - this kind of consistent and practical attention to our end goal, which is not KPIs about user satisfaction but actual user satisfaction, is precisely what we need, and I am glad to see it coming out.
On 26 August 2015 at 19:42, Erik Bernhardson ebernhardson@wikimedia.org wrote:
Thats an excellent idea, thanks Adam. Talked about it w/ max and updated the patch, i think this will work out just fine.
Erik B.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Adam Baso abaso@wikimedia.org wrote:
It may not be the appropriate parameter name to use, but this sort of technique may help:
https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Provenance
You'd want to look at the current VCL in templates/varnish in the operations repo to see how it's presently done for wprov.
-Adam
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Erik Bernhardson ebernhardson@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Chad Horohoe chorohoe@wikimedia.org wrote:
Aren't we uncached here anyway? Special pages and all.
-Chad
Actually the events we are recording here measure the users interaction with the pages they found. The current idea is to add a query parameter to all search results (only for users in the test, from javascript) so that when they land on that page we know they came from search and start collecting interaction events.
Wikimedia-search mailing list Wikimedia-search@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-search
Wikimedia-search mailing list Wikimedia-search@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-search
Wikimedia-search mailing list Wikimedia-search@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-search