Hello all WikiJournal participants,
There's been an interesting conversation in the editorial board of WikiJournal of Science of a case where an article had previously been submitted to another journal, received peer reviews, gotten declined, and now submitted to WikiJournal. Points raised include that the reputability of that other journal can be taken into account in accepting their peer reviews, and it seems unethical to omit important comments previously raised. Yet, we cannot ignore our peer reviewer criteria https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_User_Group/Peer_reviewers. It seems we need to know the identity of the peer reviewers in order to make this judgement. I think this is further necessitated by the fact that we may want to complement the peer review, and we'd risk asking the same reviewer a second time if we don't know the identity of the reviewer.
I've made a section at Editorial_guidelines#Importing_reviews https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_User_Group/Editorial_guidelines#Importing_reviews (template currently adapted for WikiJournal of Medicine but which should be up for the other journals as well in a near future) with the text: "In case a work has already undergone a peer review by another journal or reviewing service, that peer review can be accepted by WikiJournal of Medicine if the peer reviewer criteria https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_of_Medicine/Peer_reviewers#Criteria are met. This requires that the editorial board gets to know the identity of the peer reviewer, and that the reviewer agrees to have it published under creative commons license (CC BY-SA https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/). External peer reviews that do not fulfill these criteria should still be uploaded if possible, but do not count to the minimum of 2 independent peer reviews for each article."
Feel free to suggest further edits to this.
I suggest we continue discussions in wiki: https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Talk:WikiJournal_User_Group#Importing_peer_r...
Best regards,
Mikael