I had a long talk with Philip, the owner of wikijournal.org
He has worked on the project for 4 years, has 200 articles, 600 page views per day and makes a dollar a day with advertising. He will NOT accept to sell his domain for 300 dollars, it makes no sense.
Also, I should mention that his main language is Russian, so a merge with it would give us a Russian version of the project, which is something to aim for if we want the project to grow.
I think that there are three possible ways to go: 1. Seek a merge 2. Rename the project and secure the relevant .org domain from the beginning 3. Do nothing, keep developing WikiJournal on Wikiversity and see what time brings
If we want a merge, I seriously think we should ask Philip to name his price and include that into the grant request, rather than offering him a couple hundred dollars as if his work and time count for nothing. He is currently well predisposed towards a merge, largely because I approached him with respect for his work, so please don't screw it. A good predisposition will lead him to ask a reasonable price, and will also keep him active in the project after the merge.
So what do you think? Should I ask what is his price?
Kind regards,
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:40 PM Diptanshu Das das.diptanshu@gmail.com wrote:
I would favour starting a rapid grant request at the earliest. Prior to our adoption of the name "WikiJournal" the present owner of the domain WikiJournal.org was planning not to renew it. Mikael's communication had confirmed the same. But the renewed interest in the name somehow got him interested again, perhaps not for an independent project but for some unstated impending gain. In such a case a direct monetary offer as well as a trademark application seems essential.
Regards Diptanshu On 27-Feb-2017 1:43 AM, "Thomas Shafee" thomas.shafee@gmail.com wrote:
I'd support a buy-out of the WikiJournal domain. The existing project there is almost empty and has barely been updated. A google search for "WikiJournal" finds us before them. And "Wikijournal of X" finds the relevant pages as first hits.
I think that becoming the best known Wikijournal is more impedance than being the only. Similarly, as we grow, we will overtake the "wiki journal club" in Google pagerank prominence.
The WMF seemed approve of the previous grant, so I think that a new rapid grant would be a good idea. It achieves very clear outcomes, is low cost, and works towards a larger goal of solidifying the WikiJournals (med and sci) that address content quality issues they're consistently interested in.
I'll happily help out writing the grant if we go ahead (will be most free late March). Thomas
On 26 Feb 2017 04:09, "Michaël Laurent" michael.laurent@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for sharing your thoughts, if more people would do so we would advance faster imho.
I think that having the most logical name and perhaps ask Philip to donate the domain like you say, is better than a completely novel name which is less easily understood.
But I'd love to hear more from others.
BW Michaël
Op 26 feb. 2017 12:12 schreef "Gwinyai Masukume" parturitions@gmail.com:
Hi All,
If I'm not mistaken a rapid grant can be applied for at a moments notice (rather than wait for ~one year)? In my view the sooner these issues are attended to the better.
Kindest regards, Gwinyai
Apologies for brevity and typos - sent from mobile.
On 26 Feb 2017 10:17, "Diptanshu Das" das.diptanshu@gmail.com wrote:
Dear All
I would like to back Mikael. I also think that inclusion of $300 for the domain and $200 for the trademark are justified. As of now I would not be worried about the co-existence of another WikiJournal. However, I feel that our tagline (or something similar) should contain something to distinguish among the two.
Regards Diptanshu Das
Please do not print this e-mail unless you really need to.
On 26 February 2017 at 15:25, James Heilman jmh649@gmail.com wrote:
Having the same name is not a huge issue. For example there are three medical journals called "Open Medicine" (one in Canada, one in Europe, and one in the Arabic peninsula). There are also more than a dozen cities called London https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_(disambiguation)
J
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 5:51 PM, Mikael Häggström < editor.in.chief@wikijmed.org> wrote:
I appreciate your views. As for the Wikimedia Journal name, we did have a name vote a while ago to choose the current name, and that one was among the candidates (but only received a few votes): https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal/Future_as_separate_Wikimedia_pro...
I don't find the co-existence of Philip's wikijournal.org to exclude our usage of the WikiJournal name. Also, as I understand, his project is a more inclusionist https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deletionism_and_inclusionism_in_Wikipedia wiki than Wikipedia, and supported by AdSense https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AdSense ads in the articles since his goal is also to make it profitable. I actually doubt he will continue that project in the long run. I think he bought the wikijournal.org for a couple of hundred dollars, so in this year's grant application (link to that of last year https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Project/Rapid/WikiJournal_of_Medicine ) I think we can also apply for a single addition of perhaps about $300 to offer him for the domain, which I think he is likely to eventually take. Although he has invested considerable time developing his project, his project design is indeed different from our own visions, so I don't see any other aspect of wikijournal.org that we should use apart from the domain name. Nevertheless, I think we may also offer him credit as "creator of the wikijournal.org domain" at our Milestones. https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_of_Medicine/About#Milestones In any case, I think we will get hold of the wikijournal.org domain before becoming a separate Wikimedia project.
Although WikiJournal of Medicine is a registered non-profit organization, the WikiJournal name is not yet registered as a trademark by anyone. Perhaps we should add $200 to the next grant application to have the trademark registered, and then have it recognized internationally through the Madrid system. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madrid_system
Best regards,
Mikael
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 12:57 AM, Daniel Mietchen < daniel.mietchen@googlemail.com> wrote:
Dear all, I have not been privy to those past conversations but here are my comments anyway: - I am not thrilled about the name WikiJournal, given that https://wikijournal.org/ exists and what it does. - there is still room to sort out naming issues as long as we are not formally organized - there was a similar situation with Wikitravel, which resulted in the name change to Wikivoyage - another similar situation arose with WikiProject Med, which wanted to be registered as "Wikimedia Medicine", but that was not OKed by WMF - I am not sure having WikiJournal (under whatever name) as a different sister project is the best way to move forward, and in any case, it is not obvious to me how Philip could help with that other than by contributing the domain. - If it were to become a new sister project, why not just go for something like https://journal.wikimedia.org and perhaps "Wikimedia Journal"? - I think it makes sense to aim at becoming a thematic organization as a next step, once the naming issue is sorted out
Cheers, Daniel
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Gwinyai Masukume parturitions@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Diptanshu,
Several of us were not keen on Wikijournal because the name had already
been
used. I guess the naming issue is now water under the bridge.
Kindest regards, Gwinyai
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 3:08 AM, Diptanshu Das das.diptanshu@gmail.com wrote:
If you people remember, I had initially spoken against adaptation of the name Wikijournal. It was because of the confusion that entities like https://en.wikijournal.org/wiki/WikiJournal may create. The subsequent
vote
shifted toward WikiJournal and that is perfectly ok but our by-laws
should
clearly mention about this WikiJournal, the Wiki Journal Club etc.
stating
that these are independent and un-affiliated.
Regards Diptanshu
Please do not print this e-mail unless you really need to.
On 25 February 2017 at 01:57, Mikael Häggström editor.in.chief@wikijmed.org wrote:
Hi WikiJournal participants!
I had a talk with the domain owner of wikijournal.orgrecently, and it is possible to merge our projects if we attain a WikiJournal/Future as
separate
Wikimedia project - see also talk entry there at en.wikijournal.org/wiki/Talk:WikiJournal. I think the most important
next
step is to become a "thematic organization", proving that we can work
as a
separate organization: I can start a draft of bylaws soon.
Best regards,
Mikael
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
"wjmboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an
email to wjmboard+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to wjmboard@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/wjmboard/CACubOwjTwhEAY320pyqNh1GftLh0VDHJ... .
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "wjmboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to wjmboard+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to wjmboard@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/wjmboard/CADcdAx-0D5B1Xd%3DfUcwbO38Z%2B_De... .
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
WikiJournal-en mailing list WikiJournal-en@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikijournal-en