-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Mike.lifeguard:
On 10-05-25 10:40 PM, River Tarnell wrote:
> I've rewritten these two utilities to improve security.
May I ask what the security flaws were?
There was no specific problem (as far as I know), but they ran with more
privileges than were necessary. The new versions use fine-grained
privileges, reducing the impact of any security problems that might
exist.
- river.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (HP-UX)
iEYEARECAAYFAkv8giUACgkQIXd7fCuc5vJojQCfcsS2vqdd/mXR9X5KXp+fC4PD
i70An3nkm3fIH86NUZnphP8YwYYnvz+5
=D8Ld
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----