hello,
to justify buying a stable server, we need people willing to use it. so, if anyone is interested in maintaining stable tools, please add your name somewhere (i suggest [[m:Toolserver/Stable server/Candidates]] as a good place). the initial proposal suggested at least two maintainers per project, but that isn't set in stone. more maintainers is probably better.
* do not add other people's projects, or list other people as maintainers without asking them. don't add yourself as a maintainer without checking with the tool's author.
* you can list people without toolserver accounts.
this is only for stable, established projects; if your project still breaks hemlock once a week, or you aren't certain it's working well, please don't add it. similarly, new project proposals will not be considered (these should go to hemlock instead).
if the stable server goes ahead, projects which are accepted will no longer be owned by the original author; the development team members will each have equal responsibility in their development.
the exact configuration of the stable server, how it'll work, etc. are still in discussion. (please feel free to edit [[m:Toolserver/Stable server]] if you have any suggestions).
- river.
stable as in "stable versions"?
On 11/3/07, River Tarnell river@wikimedia.org wrote:
hello,
to justify buying a stable server, we need people willing to use it. so, if anyone is interested in maintaining stable tools, please add your name somewhere (i suggest [[m:Toolserver/Stable server/Candidates]] as a good place). the initial proposal suggested at least two maintainers per project, but that isn't set in stone. more maintainers is probably better.
- do not add other people's projects, or list other people as maintainers
without asking them. don't add yourself as a maintainer without checking with the tool's author.
- you can list people without toolserver accounts.
this is only for stable, established projects; if your project still breaks hemlock once a week, or you aren't certain it's working well, please don't add it. similarly, new project proposals will not be considered (these should go to hemlock instead).
if the stable server goes ahead, projects which are accepted will no longer be owned by the original author; the development team members will each have equal responsibility in their development.
the exact configuration of the stable server, how it'll work, etc. are still in discussion. (please feel free to edit [[m:Toolserver/Stable server]] if you have any suggestions).
- river.
Toolserver-l mailing list Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l
Oh, stable as opposed to instable. Never mind.
On 11/3/07, James Hare messedrocker@gmail.com wrote:
stable as in "stable versions"?
On 11/3/07, River Tarnell river@wikimedia.org wrote:
hello,
to justify buying a stable server, we need people willing to use it. so, if anyone is interested in maintaining stable tools, please add your name somewhere (i suggest [[m:Toolserver/Stable server/Candidates]] as a good place). the initial proposal suggested at least two maintainers per project, but that isn't set in stone. more maintainers is probably better.
- do not add other people's projects, or list other people as maintainers
without asking them. don't add yourself as a maintainer without checking with the tool's author.
- you can list people without toolserver accounts.
this is only for stable, established projects; if your project still breaks hemlock once a week, or you aren't certain it's working well, please don't add it. similarly, new project proposals will not be considered (these should go to hemlock instead).
if the stable server goes ahead, projects which are accepted will no longer be owned by the original author; the development team members will each have equal responsibility in their development.
the exact configuration of the stable server, how it'll work, etc. are still in discussion. (please feel free to edit [[m:Toolserver/Stable server]] if you have any suggestions).
- river.
Toolserver-l mailing list Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l
James Hare:
stable as in "stable versions"?
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Toolserver/Stable_server
- river.
A: Because it disrupts the natural flow of conversation. Q: Why is top-posting bad?
i have borrowed ragweed from Wikimedia to do testing of the stable server on (e.g. figuring out how things are going to work). so, if you're interested in testing it, and have a candidate project, let me know...
- river.
toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org