On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 7:49 AM, DaB. WP@daniel.baur4.info wrote:
Hello, At Friday 05 February 2010 15:45:21 DaB. wrote:
I requested such a policy (with a draft (even a english one))
If somebody is interested, the DRAFT can be found under [1]. I updated it today and added some stuff from the discussion here. I'm of corse interested in response (and fixing of my bad english), but I can't guarantee that it will ever accept by the WMDE.
Sincerly, DaB.
[1] https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Toollizenz/draft/en
-- wp-blog.de
Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org) https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l Posting guidelines for this list: https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
Looks good, but there is one bit in the page that has a bit of unclear wording:
"The source code of every tool is licensed under a free (like BSD) or * GPL-compatible*[1]https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Toollizenz/draft/en#cite_note-0 license by default, if it is at all possible. If this is not possible due to a less free component (like a code library), the source code adopts the license of the library by default." Would it be safe to say that the source code would be dual-licensed here, or am I reading it wrong?
Titoxd.