If you are pushing for an MMP, it would be best not to use my code. It's shoddy, poorly written, broken, and inefficient. Frankly, I'm amazed it lasted as long as it did.
-X!
On Mar 12, 2012, at 12:05 PM, Paul Selitskas p.selitskas@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Merlijn van Deen valhallasw@arctus.nl wrote:
On 12 March 2012 15:49, Hydriz Wikipedia admin@alphacorp.tk wrote:
Tparis has the full source code of those tools, and looks like he has already brought them up on his own account. See https://toolserver.org/~tparis.
Could we (in general) *please* not do this? If someones tools are important enough to be taken over by someone else, they are most certainly important enough for a multi-maintainer project. In {one month, one year, five years}, Tparis' account will also expire and we will have the same problem all over again.
Best, Merlijn
Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org) https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l Posting guidelines for this list: https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
That's a good point not to do this ever more. But then we are about to return to the stable toolserver approach, aren't we? :) By the way there is a sort of bugs in Soxred's tools concerning language code <-> project subdomain conversion which I would like to fix or at least report them (I can remind that I've already done it once in Soxred's googlecode issue tracker).
-- З павагай, Павел Селіцкас/Paul Selitskas Wizardist @ Wikimedia projects p.selitskas@gmail.com, +375257408304 Skype: p.selitskas
Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org) https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l Posting guidelines for this list: https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette