Adam Dodek Michalik wrote:
2007/11/7, MinuteElectron minuteelectron@googlemail.com:
My appologies, I didn't realise that this was indeed official. However I still maintain that it would be better to consolidate everything into one Toolserver rather than have many different projects with no coordination.
Well, I've just logged up to the "official" toolserver. The time between I typed my password and the prompt showed up was about 15 seconds. I took a quick look at `uptime` to check the load - it was high indeed, i got following output (after 5 seconds since pressing enter):
dodek@hemlock:~$ uptime 17:45:59 up 40 days, 18:21, 26 users, load average: 229.20, 238.11, 198.69
Pretty high, isn't it? If only it was uptime... Then, I did the same with Polish toolserver.
dodek@toolserv ~ $ uptime 17:25:02 up 241 days, 20:41, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
Nice, isn't it? Every time I log there in, I'm sure I'll get enough CPU time.
And, "we don't need no coordination" :) So far, our collaboration has been in good state.
Perhaps if you combined your resources into one toolserver all users would be able to share these CPU cycles, rather than users having to decide whether to use the one with more human resource tools (i.e. JIRA, FishEye etc.) or one with more availability. That way users can get the best of both worlds.
MinuteElectron.