But what when individual tools break? Which ones are important enough to try and keep running (even when people leave).
Wasn't that the point of the stable server? Having the all important tools on a stable server, and with at least two developers. So if someone leaves the tool doesn't die.
- Chris
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Finne Boonenhennar@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 12:25, Daniel Kinzlerdaniel@brightbyte.de wrote:
Hi all
during wikimedia germany's brithday party yesterday, I was asked to look into improving the communication between toolserver folks and the wiki communities using the toolserver. We have become an important part of their infrastructure, and when things break, they notice - but often don't know who to ask about it.
Are you talking about toolserver breaking as a whole or individual tools breaking?
The first can indeed be covered by blogs/signpost/Aude's interview. But what when individual tools break? Which ones are important enough to try and keep running (even when people leave).
henna
-- "Maybe you knew early on that your track went from point A to B, but unlike you I wasn't given a map at birth!" Alyssa, "Chasing Amy"
Toolserver-l mailing list Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l