Hey all,
We just published "Wikimedia Foundation hosts lively panel on copyright" to the blog. URL:
https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/
Many thanks to Lexie, Yana and Michelle for this post.
Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as needed.
*Twitter (@wikipedia/@wikimedia):* • Wikimedia Foundation Legal event draws 100+ to discuss copyright. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/
• Wikimedia hosts copyright experts debating recent mass digitization policy proposal. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/
*Facebook/Google+:* • The Wikimedia Foundation hosts leading voices on copyright for a lively panel on mass digitization. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/
thanks, Joe
Looks great! Do we want to include the speakers' twitter handles so that they retweet it to their followers? If so, here they are: @PamelaSamuelson @LilaBaileyLaw @dreamword @melvingibbs @yanatweets
Feel free to leave me out if you run out of characters. I'll retweet it regardless. :)
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Joe Sutherland jsutherland@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hey all,
We just published "Wikimedia Foundation hosts lively panel on copyright" to the blog. URL:
https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/
Many thanks to Lexie, Yana and Michelle for this post.
Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as needed.
*Twitter (@wikipedia/@wikimedia):* • Wikimedia Foundation Legal event draws 100+ to discuss copyright. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/
• Wikimedia hosts copyright experts debating recent mass digitization policy proposal. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/
*Facebook/Google+:* • The Wikimedia Foundation hosts leading voices on copyright for a lively panel on mass digitization. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/
thanks, Joe
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
Article looks good, while I watched it from home (it was one of those days sadly) I loved how the speakers actually had wildly different views at times which has not always been the case for these events (which is not required :) I enjoyed those too ). SM Comments inline
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Yana Welinder ywelinder@wikimedia.org wrote:
Looks great! Do we want to include the speakers' twitter handles so that they retweet it to their followers? If so, here they are: @PamelaSamuelson @LilaBaileyLaw @dreamword @melvingibbs @yanatweets
Feel free to leave me out if you run out of characters. I'll retweet it regardless. :)
Hmm, I give some options below (even without mentioning you it's too long without adjustment) but I'd actually stay away from mentions given how many there are. I just think the tweet itself starts to become so cluttered it's hard to use and understand for the average reader. That would end up with 5-6 different links in the tweet which is pretty rough.
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Joe Sutherland jsutherland@wikimedia.org
wrote:
Hey all,
We just published "Wikimedia Foundation hosts lively panel on copyright" to the blog. URL:
https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/
Many thanks to Lexie, Yana and Michelle for this post.
Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as needed.
*Twitter (@wikipedia/@wikimedia):* • Wikimedia Foundation Legal event draws 100+ to discuss copyright. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/
• Wikimedia hosts copyright experts debating recent mass digitization policy proposal. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/
- Both LGTM, personally I'd avoid mentions (picking just 1 or 2 to mention isn't fair and all 4-5 makes it very cluttered) and go with the 2nd one but I'm happy with both :). If we want to do the mentions then we'd probably have to take #1 and adjust it for length. Some options below. - Wikimedia Legal event draws 100+ to discuss copyright. @PamelaSamuelson https://twitter.com/PamelaSamuelson @LilaBaileyLaw https://twitter.com/LilaBaileyLaw @dreamword https://twitter.com/dreamword @melvingibbs https://twitter.com/melvingibbs https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ [6char left] - WMF Legal event draws 100+ to discuss copyright. @PamelaSamuelson https://twitter.com/PamelaSamuelson @LilaBaileyLaw https://twitter.com/LilaBaileyLaw @dreamword https://twitter.com/dreamword @melvingibbs https://twitter.com/melvingibbs @yanatweets https://twitter.com/yanatweets https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ [0 left]
*Facebook/Google+:* • The Wikimedia Foundation hosts leading voices on copyright for a lively panel on mass digitization. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/
thanks, Joe
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
FB/G+ LGTM
Why not multiple tweets, one of which has the mentions? We don't send out enough tweets anyway IMHO, and it's a good way to personally yet publicly acknowledge them.
--Ed
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 9:39 PM, James Alexander jalexander@wikimedia.org wrote:
Article looks good, while I watched it from home (it was one of those days sadly) I loved how the speakers actually had wildly different views at times which has not always been the case for these events (which is not required :) I enjoyed those too ). SM Comments inline
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Yana Welinder ywelinder@wikimedia.org wrote:
Looks great! Do we want to include the speakers' twitter handles so that they retweet it to their followers? If so, here they are: @PamelaSamuelson @LilaBaileyLaw @dreamword @melvingibbs @yanatweets
Feel free to leave me out if you run out of characters. I'll retweet it regardless. :)
Hmm, I give some options below (even without mentioning you it's too long without adjustment) but I'd actually stay away from mentions given how many there are. I just think the tweet itself starts to become so cluttered it's hard to use and understand for the average reader. That would end up with 5-6 different links in the tweet which is pretty rough.
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Joe Sutherland jsutherland@wikimedia.org
wrote:
Hey all,
We just published "Wikimedia Foundation hosts lively panel on copyright" to the blog. URL:
https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/
Many thanks to Lexie, Yana and Michelle for this post.
Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as needed.
*Twitter (@wikipedia/@wikimedia):* • Wikimedia Foundation Legal event draws 100+ to discuss copyright. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/
• Wikimedia hosts copyright experts debating recent mass digitization policy proposal. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/
- Both LGTM, personally I'd avoid mentions (picking just 1 or 2 to
mention isn't fair and all 4-5 makes it very cluttered) and go with the 2nd one but I'm happy with both :). If we want to do the mentions then we'd probably have to take #1 and adjust it for length. Some options below.
- Wikimedia Legal event draws 100+ to discuss copyright. @ PamelaSamuelson https://twitter.com/PamelaSamuelson @LilaBaileyLaw https://twitter.com/LilaBaileyLaw @dreamword https://twitter.com/dreamword @melvingibbs https://twitter.com/melvingibbs https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ [6char left]
https://twitter.com/PamelaSamuelson @LilaBaileyLaw https://twitter.com/LilaBaileyLaw @dreamword https://twitter.com/dreamword @melvingibbs https://twitter.com/melvingibbs @yanatweets https://twitter.com/yanatweets https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ [0 left]
- WMF Legal event draws 100+ to discuss copyright. @PamelaSamuelson
*Facebook/Google+:* • The Wikimedia Foundation hosts leading voices on copyright for a lively panel on mass digitization. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/
thanks, Joe
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
FB/G+ LGTM
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
I tend to agree more tweets would be better from us :) A multi-tweet sounds like a good compromise.
James Alexander Community Advocacy Wikimedia Foundation (415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
Why not multiple tweets, one of which has the mentions? We don't send out enough tweets anyway IMHO, and it's a good way to personally yet publicly acknowledge them.
--Ed
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 9:39 PM, James Alexander jalexander@wikimedia.org wrote:
Article looks good, while I watched it from home (it was one of those days sadly) I loved how the speakers actually had wildly different views at times which has not always been the case for these events (which is not required :) I enjoyed those too ). SM Comments inline
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Yana Welinder ywelinder@wikimedia.org wrote:
Looks great! Do we want to include the speakers' twitter handles so that they retweet it to their followers? If so, here they are: @PamelaSamuelson @LilaBaileyLaw @dreamword @melvingibbs @yanatweets
Feel free to leave me out if you run out of characters. I'll retweet it regardless. :)
Hmm, I give some options below (even without mentioning you it's too long without adjustment) but I'd actually stay away from mentions given how many there are. I just think the tweet itself starts to become so cluttered it's hard to use and understand for the average reader. That would end up with 5-6 different links in the tweet which is pretty rough.
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Joe Sutherland <jsutherland@wikimedia.org
wrote:
Hey all,
We just published "Wikimedia Foundation hosts lively panel on copyright" to the blog. URL:
https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/
Many thanks to Lexie, Yana and Michelle for this post.
Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as needed.
*Twitter (@wikipedia/@wikimedia):* • Wikimedia Foundation Legal event draws 100+ to discuss copyright. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/
• Wikimedia hosts copyright experts debating recent mass digitization policy proposal. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/
- Both LGTM, personally I'd avoid mentions (picking just 1 or 2 to
mention isn't fair and all 4-5 makes it very cluttered) and go with the 2nd one but I'm happy with both :). If we want to do the mentions then we'd probably have to take #1 and adjust it for length. Some options below.
- Wikimedia Legal event draws 100+ to discuss copyright. @ PamelaSamuelson https://twitter.com/PamelaSamuelson @ LilaBaileyLaw https://twitter.com/LilaBaileyLaw @dreamword https://twitter.com/dreamword @melvingibbs https://twitter.com/melvingibbs https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ [6char left]
https://twitter.com/PamelaSamuelson @LilaBaileyLaw https://twitter.com/LilaBaileyLaw @dreamword https://twitter.com/dreamword @melvingibbs https://twitter.com/melvingibbs @yanatweets https://twitter.com/yanatweets https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ [0 left]
- WMF Legal event draws 100+ to discuss copyright. @PamelaSamuelson
*Facebook/Google+:* • The Wikimedia Foundation hosts leading voices on copyright for a lively panel on mass digitization. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/
thanks, Joe
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
FB/G+ LGTM
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Ed Erhart Editorial Intern Wikimedia Foundation
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
I think avoiding tags (in favour of using an image) would be the best idea. Tweets with images I believe tend to do better anyway. Thoughts?
Joe
On 4 August 2015 at 06:30, James Alexander jalexander@wikimedia.org wrote:
I tend to agree more tweets would be better from us :) A multi-tweet sounds like a good compromise.
James Alexander Community Advocacy Wikimedia Foundation (415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
Why not multiple tweets, one of which has the mentions? We don't send out enough tweets anyway IMHO, and it's a good way to personally yet publicly acknowledge them.
--Ed
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 9:39 PM, James Alexander <jalexander@wikimedia.org
wrote:
Article looks good, while I watched it from home (it was one of those days sadly) I loved how the speakers actually had wildly different views at times which has not always been the case for these events (which is not required :) I enjoyed those too ). SM Comments inline
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Yana Welinder ywelinder@wikimedia.org wrote:
Looks great! Do we want to include the speakers' twitter handles so that they retweet it to their followers? If so, here they are: @PamelaSamuelson @LilaBaileyLaw @dreamword @melvingibbs @yanatweets
Feel free to leave me out if you run out of characters. I'll retweet it regardless. :)
Hmm, I give some options below (even without mentioning you it's too long without adjustment) but I'd actually stay away from mentions given how many there are. I just think the tweet itself starts to become so cluttered it's hard to use and understand for the average reader. That would end up with 5-6 different links in the tweet which is pretty rough.
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Joe Sutherland <
jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Hey all,
We just published "Wikimedia Foundation hosts lively panel on copyright" to the blog. URL:
https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/
Many thanks to Lexie, Yana and Michelle for this post.
Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as needed.
*Twitter (@wikipedia/@wikimedia):* • Wikimedia Foundation Legal event draws 100+ to discuss copyright. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/
• Wikimedia hosts copyright experts debating recent mass digitization policy proposal. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/
- Both LGTM, personally I'd avoid mentions (picking just 1 or 2 to
mention isn't fair and all 4-5 makes it very cluttered) and go with the 2nd one but I'm happy with both :). If we want to do the mentions then we'd probably have to take #1 and adjust it for length. Some options below.
- Wikimedia Legal event draws 100+ to discuss copyright. @ PamelaSamuelson https://twitter.com/PamelaSamuelson @ LilaBaileyLaw https://twitter.com/LilaBaileyLaw @dreamword https://twitter.com/dreamword @melvingibbs https://twitter.com/melvingibbs https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ [6char left]
PamelaSamuelson https://twitter.com/PamelaSamuelson @ LilaBaileyLaw https://twitter.com/LilaBaileyLaw @dreamword https://twitter.com/dreamword @melvingibbs https://twitter.com/melvingibbs @yanatweets https://twitter.com/yanatweets https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ [0 left]
- WMF Legal event draws 100+ to discuss copyright. @
*Facebook/Google+:* • The Wikimedia Foundation hosts leading voices on copyright for a lively panel on mass digitization. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/
thanks, Joe
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
FB/G+ LGTM
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Ed Erhart Editorial Intern Wikimedia Foundation
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
We've shared:
FB: https://www.facebook.com/wikipedia/posts/10153431035108346
@Wikipedia: https://twitter.com/Wikipedia/status/628595487982141440 @Wikimedia: https://twitter.com/Wikimedia/status/628595488040853504
WP G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/100123345029543043288/+Wikipedia/posts/JvJbTPo... WMF G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/108193079736330787108/108193079736330787108/po...
On 4 August 2015 at 16:05, Joe Sutherland jsutherland@wikimedia.org wrote:
I think avoiding tags (in favour of using an image) would be the best idea. Tweets with images I believe tend to do better anyway. Thoughts?
Joe
On 4 August 2015 at 06:30, James Alexander jalexander@wikimedia.org wrote:
I tend to agree more tweets would be better from us :) A multi-tweet sounds like a good compromise.
James Alexander Community Advocacy Wikimedia Foundation (415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
Why not multiple tweets, one of which has the mentions? We don't send out enough tweets anyway IMHO, and it's a good way to personally yet publicly acknowledge them.
--Ed
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 9:39 PM, James Alexander < jalexander@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Article looks good, while I watched it from home (it was one of those days sadly) I loved how the speakers actually had wildly different views at times which has not always been the case for these events (which is not required :) I enjoyed those too ). SM Comments inline
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Yana Welinder ywelinder@wikimedia.org wrote:
Looks great! Do we want to include the speakers' twitter handles so that they retweet it to their followers? If so, here they are: @PamelaSamuelson @LilaBaileyLaw @dreamword @melvingibbs @yanatweets
Feel free to leave me out if you run out of characters. I'll retweet it regardless. :)
Hmm, I give some options below (even without mentioning you it's too long without adjustment) but I'd actually stay away from mentions given how many there are. I just think the tweet itself starts to become so cluttered it's hard to use and understand for the average reader. That would end up with 5-6 different links in the tweet which is pretty rough.
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Joe Sutherland <
jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Hey all,
We just published "Wikimedia Foundation hosts lively panel on copyright" to the blog. URL:
https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/
Many thanks to Lexie, Yana and Michelle for this post.
Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as needed.
*Twitter (@wikipedia/@wikimedia):* • Wikimedia Foundation Legal event draws 100+ to discuss copyright. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/
• Wikimedia hosts copyright experts debating recent mass digitization policy proposal. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/
- Both LGTM, personally I'd avoid mentions (picking just 1 or 2 to
mention isn't fair and all 4-5 makes it very cluttered) and go with the 2nd one but I'm happy with both :). If we want to do the mentions then we'd probably have to take #1 and adjust it for length. Some options below.
- Wikimedia Legal event draws 100+ to discuss copyright. @ PamelaSamuelson https://twitter.com/PamelaSamuelson @ LilaBaileyLaw https://twitter.com/LilaBaileyLaw @dreamword https://twitter.com/dreamword @melvingibbs https://twitter.com/melvingibbs https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ [6char left]
PamelaSamuelson https://twitter.com/PamelaSamuelson @ LilaBaileyLaw https://twitter.com/LilaBaileyLaw @dreamword https://twitter.com/dreamword @melvingibbs https://twitter.com/melvingibbs @yanatweets https://twitter.com/yanatweets https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ [0 left]
- WMF Legal event draws 100+ to discuss copyright. @
*Facebook/Google+:* • The Wikimedia Foundation hosts leading voices on copyright for a lively panel on mass digitization. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/
thanks, Joe
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
FB/G+ LGTM
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Ed Erhart Editorial Intern Wikimedia Foundation
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
Nice! If we are doing a second tweet about this, I'd advise against abbreviating "Wikimedia" as "WMF" as it's not very well-known outside a small circle of people.
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Joe Sutherland jsutherland@wikimedia.org wrote:
We've shared:
FB: https://www.facebook.com/wikipedia/posts/10153431035108346
@Wikipedia: https://twitter.com/Wikipedia/status/628595487982141440 @Wikimedia: https://twitter.com/Wikimedia/status/628595488040853504
WP G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/100123345029543043288/+Wikipedia/posts/JvJbTPo... WMF G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/108193079736330787108/108193079736330787108/po...
On 4 August 2015 at 16:05, Joe Sutherland jsutherland@wikimedia.org wrote:
I think avoiding tags (in favour of using an image) would be the best idea. Tweets with images I believe tend to do better anyway. Thoughts?
Joe
On 4 August 2015 at 06:30, James Alexander jalexander@wikimedia.org wrote:
I tend to agree more tweets would be better from us :) A multi-tweet sounds like a good compromise.
James Alexander Community Advocacy Wikimedia Foundation (415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
Why not multiple tweets, one of which has the mentions? We don't send out enough tweets anyway IMHO, and it's a good way to personally yet publicly acknowledge them.
--Ed
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 9:39 PM, James Alexander < jalexander@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Article looks good, while I watched it from home (it was one of those days sadly) I loved how the speakers actually had wildly different views at times which has not always been the case for these events (which is not required :) I enjoyed those too ). SM Comments inline
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Yana Welinder <ywelinder@wikimedia.org
wrote:
Looks great! Do we want to include the speakers' twitter handles so that they retweet it to their followers? If so, here they are: @PamelaSamuelson @LilaBaileyLaw @dreamword @melvingibbs @yanatweets
Feel free to leave me out if you run out of characters. I'll retweet it regardless. :)
Hmm, I give some options below (even without mentioning you it's too long without adjustment) but I'd actually stay away from mentions given how many there are. I just think the tweet itself starts to become so cluttered it's hard to use and understand for the average reader. That would end up with 5-6 different links in the tweet which is pretty rough.
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Joe Sutherland <
jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> Hey all, > > We just published "Wikimedia Foundation hosts lively panel on > copyright" to the blog. URL: > > https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ > > Many thanks to Lexie, Yana and Michelle for this post. > > Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as > needed. > > *Twitter (@wikipedia/@wikimedia):* > • Wikimedia Foundation Legal event draws 100+ to discuss copyright. > https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ > > • Wikimedia hosts copyright experts debating recent mass > digitization policy proposal. > https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ >
- Both LGTM, personally I'd avoid mentions (picking just 1 or 2 to
mention isn't fair and all 4-5 makes it very cluttered) and go with the 2nd one but I'm happy with both :). If we want to do the mentions then we'd probably have to take #1 and adjust it for length. Some options below.
- Wikimedia Legal event draws 100+ to discuss copyright. @ PamelaSamuelson https://twitter.com/PamelaSamuelson @ LilaBaileyLaw https://twitter.com/LilaBaileyLaw @dreamword https://twitter.com/dreamword @melvingibbs https://twitter.com/melvingibbs https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ [6char left]
PamelaSamuelson https://twitter.com/PamelaSamuelson @ LilaBaileyLaw https://twitter.com/LilaBaileyLaw @dreamword https://twitter.com/dreamword @melvingibbs https://twitter.com/melvingibbs @yanatweets https://twitter.com/yanatweets https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ [0 left]
- WMF Legal event draws 100+ to discuss copyright. @
> > *Facebook/Google+:* > • The Wikimedia Foundation hosts leading voices on copyright for a > lively panel on mass digitization. > https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ > > thanks, > Joe > > -- > *Joe Sutherland* > Communications Intern [remote] > m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: > JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF) >
FB/G+ LGTM
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Ed Erhart Editorial Intern Wikimedia Foundation
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
Sure, can do. The counter argument to that is that we probably shouldn't use "Wikimedia" to refer to the Foundation, since really it refers to the whole movement. We can use Wikimedia Foundation, though.
Joe
On 4 August 2015 at 17:43, Yana Welinder ywelinder@wikimedia.org wrote:
Nice! If we are doing a second tweet about this, I'd advise against abbreviating "Wikimedia" as "WMF" as it's not very well-known outside a small circle of people.
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Joe Sutherland jsutherland@wikimedia.org wrote:
We've shared:
FB: https://www.facebook.com/wikipedia/posts/10153431035108346
@Wikipedia: https://twitter.com/Wikipedia/status/628595487982141440 @Wikimedia: https://twitter.com/Wikimedia/status/628595488040853504
WP G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/100123345029543043288/+Wikipedia/posts/JvJbTPo... WMF G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/108193079736330787108/108193079736330787108/po...
On 4 August 2015 at 16:05, Joe Sutherland jsutherland@wikimedia.org wrote:
I think avoiding tags (in favour of using an image) would be the best idea. Tweets with images I believe tend to do better anyway. Thoughts?
Joe
On 4 August 2015 at 06:30, James Alexander jalexander@wikimedia.org wrote:
I tend to agree more tweets would be better from us :) A multi-tweet sounds like a good compromise.
James Alexander Community Advocacy Wikimedia Foundation (415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
Why not multiple tweets, one of which has the mentions? We don't send out enough tweets anyway IMHO, and it's a good way to personally yet publicly acknowledge them.
--Ed
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 9:39 PM, James Alexander < jalexander@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Article looks good, while I watched it from home (it was one of those days sadly) I loved how the speakers actually had wildly different views at times which has not always been the case for these events (which is not required :) I enjoyed those too ). SM Comments inline
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Yana Welinder < ywelinder@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> Looks great! Do we want to include the speakers' twitter handles so > that they retweet it to their followers? If so, here they are: > @PamelaSamuelson @LilaBaileyLaw @dreamword @melvingibbs @yanatweets > > Feel free to leave me out if you run out of characters. I'll retweet > it regardless. :) > > Hmm, I give some options below (even without mentioning you it's too long without adjustment) but I'd actually stay away from mentions given how many there are. I just think the tweet itself starts to become so cluttered it's hard to use and understand for the average reader. That would end up with 5-6 different links in the tweet which is pretty rough.
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Joe Sutherland < > jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote: > >> Hey all, >> >> We just published "Wikimedia Foundation hosts lively panel on >> copyright" to the blog. URL: >> >> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ >> >> Many thanks to Lexie, Yana and Michelle for this post. >> >> Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as >> needed. >> >> *Twitter (@wikipedia/@wikimedia):* >> • Wikimedia Foundation Legal event draws 100+ to discuss copyright. >> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ >> >> • Wikimedia hosts copyright experts debating recent mass >> digitization policy proposal. >> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ >> >
- Both LGTM, personally I'd avoid mentions (picking just 1 or 2
to mention isn't fair and all 4-5 makes it very cluttered) and go with the 2nd one but I'm happy with both :). If we want to do the mentions then we'd probably have to take #1 and adjust it for length. Some options below.
- Wikimedia Legal event draws 100+ to discuss copyright. @ PamelaSamuelson https://twitter.com/PamelaSamuelson @ LilaBaileyLaw https://twitter.com/LilaBaileyLaw @dreamword https://twitter.com/dreamword @melvingibbs https://twitter.com/melvingibbs https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ [6char left]
PamelaSamuelson https://twitter.com/PamelaSamuelson @ LilaBaileyLaw https://twitter.com/LilaBaileyLaw @dreamword https://twitter.com/dreamword @melvingibbs https://twitter.com/melvingibbs @yanatweets https://twitter.com/yanatweets https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ [0 left]
- WMF Legal event draws 100+ to discuss copyright. @
>> >> *Facebook/Google+:* >> • The Wikimedia Foundation hosts leading voices on copyright for a >> lively panel on mass digitization. >> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ >> >> thanks, >> Joe >> >> -- >> *Joe Sutherland* >> Communications Intern [remote] >> m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | >> w: JSutherland >> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF) >> > FB/G+ LGTM
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Ed Erhart Editorial Intern Wikimedia Foundation
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
-- Yana Welinder Legal Director Wikimedia Foundation 415.839.6885 ext. 6867 @yanatweets https://twitter.com/yanatweets
NOTICE: This message may be confidential or legally privileged. If you have received it by accident, please delete it and let us know about the mistake.
As an attorney for the Wikimedia Foundation, for legal/ethical reasons I cannot give legal advice to, or serve as a lawyer for, community members, volunteers, or staff members in their personal capacity. In other words, IANYL https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IANAL. For more on what this means, please see our legal disclaimer https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Legal_Disclaimer.
I usually use @Wikimedia as that handle is then defined "The official account of the Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit that operates @Wikipedia." Would work for tweets from @Wikipedia. Not sure if that would be weird coming from @Wikimedia :)
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Joe Sutherland jsutherland@wikimedia.org wrote:
Sure, can do. The counter argument to that is that we probably shouldn't use "Wikimedia" to refer to the Foundation, since really it refers to the whole movement. We can use Wikimedia Foundation, though.
Joe
On 4 August 2015 at 17:43, Yana Welinder ywelinder@wikimedia.org wrote:
Nice! If we are doing a second tweet about this, I'd advise against abbreviating "Wikimedia" as "WMF" as it's not very well-known outside a small circle of people.
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Joe Sutherland <jsutherland@wikimedia.org
wrote:
We've shared:
FB: https://www.facebook.com/wikipedia/posts/10153431035108346
@Wikipedia: https://twitter.com/Wikipedia/status/628595487982141440 @Wikimedia: https://twitter.com/Wikimedia/status/628595488040853504
WP G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/100123345029543043288/+Wikipedia/posts/JvJbTPo... WMF G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/108193079736330787108/108193079736330787108/po...
On 4 August 2015 at 16:05, Joe Sutherland jsutherland@wikimedia.org wrote:
I think avoiding tags (in favour of using an image) would be the best idea. Tweets with images I believe tend to do better anyway. Thoughts?
Joe
On 4 August 2015 at 06:30, James Alexander jalexander@wikimedia.org wrote:
I tend to agree more tweets would be better from us :) A multi-tweet sounds like a good compromise.
James Alexander Community Advocacy Wikimedia Foundation (415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
Why not multiple tweets, one of which has the mentions? We don't send out enough tweets anyway IMHO, and it's a good way to personally yet publicly acknowledge them.
--Ed
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 9:39 PM, James Alexander < jalexander@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> Article looks good, while I watched it from home (it was one of > those days sadly) I loved how the speakers actually had wildly different > views at times which has not always been the case for these events (which > is not required :) I enjoyed those too ). SM Comments inline > > On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Yana Welinder < > ywelinder@wikimedia.org> wrote: > >> Looks great! Do we want to include the speakers' twitter handles >> so that they retweet it to their followers? If so, here they are: >> @PamelaSamuelson @LilaBaileyLaw @dreamword @melvingibbs @yanatweets >> >> Feel free to leave me out if you run out of characters. I'll >> retweet it regardless. :) >> >> > Hmm, I give some options below (even without mentioning you it's too > long without adjustment) but I'd actually stay away from mentions given how > many there are. I just think the tweet itself starts to become so cluttered > it's hard to use and understand for the average reader. That would end up > with 5-6 different links in the tweet which is pretty rough. > > On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Joe Sutherland < >> jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote: >> >>> Hey all, >>> >>> We just published "Wikimedia Foundation hosts lively panel on >>> copyright" to the blog. URL: >>> >>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ >>> >>> Many thanks to Lexie, Yana and Michelle for this post. >>> >>> Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as >>> needed. >>> >>> *Twitter (@wikipedia/@wikimedia):* >>> • Wikimedia Foundation Legal event draws 100+ to discuss >>> copyright. >>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ >>> >>> • Wikimedia hosts copyright experts debating recent mass >>> digitization policy proposal. >>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ >>> >> > > - Both LGTM, personally I'd avoid mentions (picking just 1 or 2 > to mention isn't fair and all 4-5 makes it very cluttered) and go with the > 2nd one but I'm happy with both :). If we want to do the mentions then we'd > probably have to take #1 and adjust it for length. Some options below. > - Wikimedia Legal event draws 100+ to discuss copyright. @ > PamelaSamuelson https://twitter.com/PamelaSamuelson @ > LilaBaileyLaw https://twitter.com/LilaBaileyLaw @dreamword > https://twitter.com/dreamword @melvingibbs > https://twitter.com/melvingibbs > https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ [6char > left] > - WMF Legal event draws 100+ to discuss copyright. @ > PamelaSamuelson https://twitter.com/PamelaSamuelson @ > LilaBaileyLaw https://twitter.com/LilaBaileyLaw @dreamword > https://twitter.com/dreamword @melvingibbs > https://twitter.com/melvingibbs @yanatweets > https://twitter.com/yanatweets > https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ [0 > left] > > >>> >>> *Facebook/Google+:* >>> • The Wikimedia Foundation hosts leading voices on copyright for a >>> lively panel on mass digitization. >>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ >>> >>> thanks, >>> Joe >>> >>> -- >>> *Joe Sutherland* >>> Communications Intern [remote] >>> m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | >>> w: JSutherland >>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF) >>> >> > FB/G+ LGTM > > _______________________________________________ > Social-media mailing list > Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media > >
-- Ed Erhart Editorial Intern Wikimedia Foundation
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
-- Yana Welinder Legal Director Wikimedia Foundation 415.839.6885 ext. 6867 @yanatweets https://twitter.com/yanatweets
NOTICE: This message may be confidential or legally privileged. If you have received it by accident, please delete it and let us know about the mistake.
As an attorney for the Wikimedia Foundation, for legal/ethical reasons I cannot give legal advice to, or serve as a lawyer for, community members, volunteers, or staff members in their personal capacity. In other words, IANYL https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IANAL. For more on what this means, please see our legal disclaimer https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Legal_Disclaimer.
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
That's a good workaround. I'd be wary of upsetting the community (there are at least some of them who dislike the usage of "Wikimedia" to refer to the Foundation alone), but this seems a rare enough occurance :)
On 4 August 2015 at 17:48, Yana Welinder ywelinder@wikimedia.org wrote:
I usually use @Wikimedia as that handle is then defined "The official account of the Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit that operates @Wikipedia." Would work for tweets from @Wikipedia. Not sure if that would be weird coming from @Wikimedia :)
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Joe Sutherland jsutherland@wikimedia.org wrote:
Sure, can do. The counter argument to that is that we probably shouldn't use "Wikimedia" to refer to the Foundation, since really it refers to the whole movement. We can use Wikimedia Foundation, though.
Joe
On 4 August 2015 at 17:43, Yana Welinder ywelinder@wikimedia.org wrote:
Nice! If we are doing a second tweet about this, I'd advise against abbreviating "Wikimedia" as "WMF" as it's not very well-known outside a small circle of people.
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Joe Sutherland < jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote:
We've shared:
FB: https://www.facebook.com/wikipedia/posts/10153431035108346
@Wikipedia: https://twitter.com/Wikipedia/status/628595487982141440 @Wikimedia: https://twitter.com/Wikimedia/status/628595488040853504
WP G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/100123345029543043288/+Wikipedia/posts/JvJbTPo... WMF G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/108193079736330787108/108193079736330787108/po...
On 4 August 2015 at 16:05, Joe Sutherland jsutherland@wikimedia.org wrote:
I think avoiding tags (in favour of using an image) would be the best idea. Tweets with images I believe tend to do better anyway. Thoughts?
Joe
On 4 August 2015 at 06:30, James Alexander jalexander@wikimedia.org wrote:
I tend to agree more tweets would be better from us :) A multi-tweet sounds like a good compromise.
James Alexander Community Advocacy Wikimedia Foundation (415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
> Why not multiple tweets, one of which has the mentions? We don't > send out enough tweets anyway IMHO, and it's a good way to personally yet > publicly acknowledge them. > > --Ed > > On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 9:39 PM, James Alexander < > jalexander@wikimedia.org> wrote: > >> Article looks good, while I watched it from home (it was one of >> those days sadly) I loved how the speakers actually had wildly different >> views at times which has not always been the case for these events (which >> is not required :) I enjoyed those too ). SM Comments inline >> >> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Yana Welinder < >> ywelinder@wikimedia.org> wrote: >> >>> Looks great! Do we want to include the speakers' twitter handles >>> so that they retweet it to their followers? If so, here they are: >>> @PamelaSamuelson @LilaBaileyLaw @dreamword @melvingibbs @yanatweets >>> >>> Feel free to leave me out if you run out of characters. I'll >>> retweet it regardless. :) >>> >>> >> Hmm, I give some options below (even without mentioning you it's >> too long without adjustment) but I'd actually stay away from mentions given >> how many there are. I just think the tweet itself starts to become so >> cluttered it's hard to use and understand for the average reader. That >> would end up with 5-6 different links in the tweet which is pretty rough. >> >> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Joe Sutherland < >>> jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Hey all, >>>> >>>> We just published "Wikimedia Foundation hosts lively panel on >>>> copyright" to the blog. URL: >>>> >>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ >>>> >>>> Many thanks to Lexie, Yana and Michelle for this post. >>>> >>>> Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as >>>> needed. >>>> >>>> *Twitter (@wikipedia/@wikimedia):* >>>> • Wikimedia Foundation Legal event draws 100+ to discuss >>>> copyright. >>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ >>>> >>>> • Wikimedia hosts copyright experts debating recent mass >>>> digitization policy proposal. >>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ >>>> >>> >> >> - Both LGTM, personally I'd avoid mentions (picking just 1 or 2 >> to mention isn't fair and all 4-5 makes it very cluttered) and go with the >> 2nd one but I'm happy with both :). If we want to do the mentions then we'd >> probably have to take #1 and adjust it for length. Some options below. >> - Wikimedia Legal event draws 100+ to discuss copyright. @ >> PamelaSamuelson https://twitter.com/PamelaSamuelson @ >> LilaBaileyLaw https://twitter.com/LilaBaileyLaw @dreamword >> https://twitter.com/dreamword @melvingibbs >> https://twitter.com/melvingibbs >> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ [6char >> left] >> - WMF Legal event draws 100+ to discuss copyright. @ >> PamelaSamuelson https://twitter.com/PamelaSamuelson @ >> LilaBaileyLaw https://twitter.com/LilaBaileyLaw @dreamword >> https://twitter.com/dreamword @melvingibbs >> https://twitter.com/melvingibbs @yanatweets >> https://twitter.com/yanatweets >> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ [0 >> left] >> >> >>>> >>>> *Facebook/Google+:* >>>> • The Wikimedia Foundation hosts leading voices on copyright for >>>> a lively panel on mass digitization. >>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ >>>> >>>> thanks, >>>> Joe >>>> >>>> -- >>>> *Joe Sutherland* >>>> Communications Intern [remote] >>>> m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | >>>> w: JSutherland >>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF) >>>> >>> >> FB/G+ LGTM >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Social-media mailing list >> Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >> >> > > > -- > Ed Erhart > Editorial Intern > Wikimedia Foundation > > _______________________________________________ > Social-media mailing list > Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media > >
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
-- Yana Welinder Legal Director Wikimedia Foundation 415.839.6885 ext. 6867 @yanatweets https://twitter.com/yanatweets
NOTICE: This message may be confidential or legally privileged. If you have received it by accident, please delete it and let us know about the mistake.
As an attorney for the Wikimedia Foundation, for legal/ethical reasons I cannot give legal advice to, or serve as a lawyer for, community members, volunteers, or staff members in their personal capacity. In other words, IANYL https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IANAL. For more on what this means, please see our legal disclaimer https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Legal_Disclaimer.
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
-- Yana Welinder Legal Director Wikimedia Foundation 415.839.6885 ext. 6867 @yanatweets https://twitter.com/yanatweets
NOTICE: This message may be confidential or legally privileged. If you have received it by accident, please delete it and let us know about the mistake.
As an attorney for the Wikimedia Foundation, for legal/ethical reasons I cannot give legal advice to, or serve as a lawyer for, community members, volunteers, or staff members in their personal capacity. In other words, IANYL https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IANAL. For more on what this means, please see our legal disclaimer https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Legal_Disclaimer.
so, would not using "@Wikimedia Foundation" suffice?
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Joe Sutherland jsutherland@wikimedia.org wrote:
That's a good workaround. I'd be wary of upsetting the community (there are at least some of them who dislike the usage of "Wikimedia" to refer to the Foundation alone), but this seems a rare enough occurance :)
On 4 August 2015 at 17:48, Yana Welinder ywelinder@wikimedia.org wrote:
I usually use @Wikimedia as that handle is then defined "The official account of the Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit that operates @Wikipedia." Would work for tweets from @Wikipedia. Not sure if that would be weird coming from @Wikimedia :)
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Joe Sutherland <jsutherland@wikimedia.org
wrote:
Sure, can do. The counter argument to that is that we probably shouldn't use "Wikimedia" to refer to the Foundation, since really it refers to the whole movement. We can use Wikimedia Foundation, though.
Joe
On 4 August 2015 at 17:43, Yana Welinder ywelinder@wikimedia.org wrote:
Nice! If we are doing a second tweet about this, I'd advise against abbreviating "Wikimedia" as "WMF" as it's not very well-known outside a small circle of people.
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Joe Sutherland < jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote:
We've shared:
FB: https://www.facebook.com/wikipedia/posts/10153431035108346
@Wikipedia: https://twitter.com/Wikipedia/status/628595487982141440 @Wikimedia: https://twitter.com/Wikimedia/status/628595488040853504
WP G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/100123345029543043288/+Wikipedia/posts/JvJbTPo... WMF G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/108193079736330787108/108193079736330787108/po...
On 4 August 2015 at 16:05, Joe Sutherland jsutherland@wikimedia.org wrote:
I think avoiding tags (in favour of using an image) would be the best idea. Tweets with images I believe tend to do better anyway. Thoughts?
Joe
On 4 August 2015 at 06:30, James Alexander jalexander@wikimedia.org wrote:
> I tend to agree more tweets would be better from us :) A multi-tweet > sounds like a good compromise. > > James Alexander > Community Advocacy > Wikimedia Foundation > (415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur > > On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org > wrote: > >> Why not multiple tweets, one of which has the mentions? We don't >> send out enough tweets anyway IMHO, and it's a good way to personally yet >> publicly acknowledge them. >> >> --Ed >> >> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 9:39 PM, James Alexander < >> jalexander@wikimedia.org> wrote: >> >>> Article looks good, while I watched it from home (it was one of >>> those days sadly) I loved how the speakers actually had wildly different >>> views at times which has not always been the case for these events (which >>> is not required :) I enjoyed those too ). SM Comments inline >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Yana Welinder < >>> ywelinder@wikimedia.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Looks great! Do we want to include the speakers' twitter handles >>>> so that they retweet it to their followers? If so, here they are: >>>> @PamelaSamuelson @LilaBaileyLaw @dreamword @melvingibbs @yanatweets >>>> >>>> Feel free to leave me out if you run out of characters. I'll >>>> retweet it regardless. :) >>>> >>>> >>> Hmm, I give some options below (even without mentioning you it's >>> too long without adjustment) but I'd actually stay away from mentions given >>> how many there are. I just think the tweet itself starts to become so >>> cluttered it's hard to use and understand for the average reader. That >>> would end up with 5-6 different links in the tweet which is pretty rough. >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Joe Sutherland < >>>> jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hey all, >>>>> >>>>> We just published "Wikimedia Foundation hosts lively panel on >>>>> copyright" to the blog. URL: >>>>> >>>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ >>>>> >>>>> Many thanks to Lexie, Yana and Michelle for this post. >>>>> >>>>> Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as >>>>> needed. >>>>> >>>>> *Twitter (@wikipedia/@wikimedia):* >>>>> • Wikimedia Foundation Legal event draws 100+ to discuss >>>>> copyright. >>>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ >>>>> >>>>> • Wikimedia hosts copyright experts debating recent mass >>>>> digitization policy proposal. >>>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> - Both LGTM, personally I'd avoid mentions (picking just 1 or >>> 2 to mention isn't fair and all 4-5 makes it very cluttered) and go with >>> the 2nd one but I'm happy with both :). If we want to do the mentions then >>> we'd probably have to take #1 and adjust it for length. Some options below. >>> - Wikimedia Legal event draws 100+ to discuss copyright. @ >>> PamelaSamuelson https://twitter.com/PamelaSamuelson @ >>> LilaBaileyLaw https://twitter.com/LilaBaileyLaw @dreamword >>> https://twitter.com/dreamword @melvingibbs >>> https://twitter.com/melvingibbs >>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ [6char >>> left] >>> - WMF Legal event draws 100+ to discuss copyright. @ >>> PamelaSamuelson https://twitter.com/PamelaSamuelson @ >>> LilaBaileyLaw https://twitter.com/LilaBaileyLaw @dreamword >>> https://twitter.com/dreamword @melvingibbs >>> https://twitter.com/melvingibbs @yanatweets >>> https://twitter.com/yanatweets >>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ [0 >>> left] >>> >>> >>>>> >>>>> *Facebook/Google+:* >>>>> • The Wikimedia Foundation hosts leading voices on copyright for >>>>> a lively panel on mass digitization. >>>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ >>>>> >>>>> thanks, >>>>> Joe >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> *Joe Sutherland* >>>>> Communications Intern [remote] >>>>> m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu >>>>> | w: JSutherland >>>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF) >>>>> >>>> >>> FB/G+ LGTM >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Social-media mailing list >>> Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Ed Erhart >> Editorial Intern >> Wikimedia Foundation >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Social-media mailing list >> Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Social-media mailing list > Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media > >
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
-- Yana Welinder Legal Director Wikimedia Foundation 415.839.6885 ext. 6867 @yanatweets https://twitter.com/yanatweets
NOTICE: This message may be confidential or legally privileged. If you have received it by accident, please delete it and let us know about the mistake.
As an attorney for the Wikimedia Foundation, for legal/ethical reasons I cannot give legal advice to, or serve as a lawyer for, community members, volunteers, or staff members in their personal capacity. In other words, IANYL https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IANAL. For more on what this means, please see our legal disclaimer https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Legal_Disclaimer.
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
-- Yana Welinder Legal Director Wikimedia Foundation 415.839.6885 ext. 6867 @yanatweets https://twitter.com/yanatweets
NOTICE: This message may be confidential or legally privileged. If you have received it by accident, please delete it and let us know about the mistake.
As an attorney for the Wikimedia Foundation, for legal/ethical reasons I cannot give legal advice to, or serve as a lawyer for, community members, volunteers, or staff members in their personal capacity. In other words, IANYL https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IANAL. For more on what this means, please see our legal disclaimer https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Legal_Disclaimer.
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
If you're tweeting from @wikimedia that wouldn't do, of course. We could probably do "the Foundation" though?
Joe
On 4 August 2015 at 18:24, Michael Guss mguss@wikimedia.org wrote:
so, would not using "@Wikimedia Foundation" suffice?
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Joe Sutherland <jsutherland@wikimedia.org
wrote:
That's a good workaround. I'd be wary of upsetting the community (there are at least some of them who dislike the usage of "Wikimedia" to refer to the Foundation alone), but this seems a rare enough occurance :)
On 4 August 2015 at 17:48, Yana Welinder ywelinder@wikimedia.org wrote:
I usually use @Wikimedia as that handle is then defined "The official account of the Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit that operates @Wikipedia." Would work for tweets from @Wikipedia. Not sure if that would be weird coming from @Wikimedia :)
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Joe Sutherland < jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Sure, can do. The counter argument to that is that we probably shouldn't use "Wikimedia" to refer to the Foundation, since really it refers to the whole movement. We can use Wikimedia Foundation, though.
Joe
On 4 August 2015 at 17:43, Yana Welinder ywelinder@wikimedia.org wrote:
Nice! If we are doing a second tweet about this, I'd advise against abbreviating "Wikimedia" as "WMF" as it's not very well-known outside a small circle of people.
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Joe Sutherland < jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote:
We've shared:
FB: https://www.facebook.com/wikipedia/posts/10153431035108346
@Wikipedia: https://twitter.com/Wikipedia/status/628595487982141440 @Wikimedia: https://twitter.com/Wikimedia/status/628595488040853504
WP G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/100123345029543043288/+Wikipedia/posts/JvJbTPo... WMF G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/108193079736330787108/108193079736330787108/po...
On 4 August 2015 at 16:05, Joe Sutherland jsutherland@wikimedia.org wrote:
> I think avoiding tags (in favour of using an image) would be the > best idea. Tweets with images I believe tend to do better anyway. Thoughts? > > Joe > > On 4 August 2015 at 06:30, James Alexander <jalexander@wikimedia.org > > wrote: > >> I tend to agree more tweets would be better from us :) A >> multi-tweet sounds like a good compromise. >> >> James Alexander >> Community Advocacy >> Wikimedia Foundation >> (415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur >> >> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org >> wrote: >> >>> Why not multiple tweets, one of which has the mentions? We don't >>> send out enough tweets anyway IMHO, and it's a good way to personally yet >>> publicly acknowledge them. >>> >>> --Ed >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 9:39 PM, James Alexander < >>> jalexander@wikimedia.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Article looks good, while I watched it from home (it was one of >>>> those days sadly) I loved how the speakers actually had wildly different >>>> views at times which has not always been the case for these events (which >>>> is not required :) I enjoyed those too ). SM Comments inline >>>> >>>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Yana Welinder < >>>> ywelinder@wikimedia.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Looks great! Do we want to include the speakers' twitter >>>>> handles so that they retweet it to their followers? If so, here they are: >>>>> @PamelaSamuelson @LilaBaileyLaw @dreamword @melvingibbs @yanatweets >>>>> >>>>> Feel free to leave me out if you run out of characters. I'll >>>>> retweet it regardless. :) >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Hmm, I give some options below (even without mentioning you it's >>>> too long without adjustment) but I'd actually stay away from mentions given >>>> how many there are. I just think the tweet itself starts to become so >>>> cluttered it's hard to use and understand for the average reader. That >>>> would end up with 5-6 different links in the tweet which is pretty rough. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Joe Sutherland < >>>>> jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hey all, >>>>>> >>>>>> We just published "Wikimedia Foundation hosts lively panel on >>>>>> copyright" to the blog. URL: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ >>>>>> >>>>>> Many thanks to Lexie, Yana and Michelle for this post. >>>>>> >>>>>> Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as >>>>>> needed. >>>>>> >>>>>> *Twitter (@wikipedia/@wikimedia):* >>>>>> • Wikimedia Foundation Legal event draws 100+ to discuss >>>>>> copyright. >>>>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ >>>>>> >>>>>> • Wikimedia hosts copyright experts debating recent mass >>>>>> digitization policy proposal. >>>>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> - Both LGTM, personally I'd avoid mentions (picking just 1 or >>>> 2 to mention isn't fair and all 4-5 makes it very cluttered) and go with >>>> the 2nd one but I'm happy with both :). If we want to do the mentions then >>>> we'd probably have to take #1 and adjust it for length. Some options below. >>>> - Wikimedia Legal event draws 100+ to discuss copyright. @ >>>> PamelaSamuelson https://twitter.com/PamelaSamuelson @ >>>> LilaBaileyLaw https://twitter.com/LilaBaileyLaw @ >>>> dreamword https://twitter.com/dreamword @melvingibbs >>>> https://twitter.com/melvingibbs >>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ [6char >>>> left] >>>> - WMF Legal event draws 100+ to discuss copyright. @ >>>> PamelaSamuelson https://twitter.com/PamelaSamuelson @ >>>> LilaBaileyLaw https://twitter.com/LilaBaileyLaw @ >>>> dreamword https://twitter.com/dreamword @melvingibbs >>>> https://twitter.com/melvingibbs @yanatweets >>>> https://twitter.com/yanatweets >>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ [0 >>>> left] >>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *Facebook/Google+:* >>>>>> • The Wikimedia Foundation hosts leading voices on copyright >>>>>> for a lively panel on mass digitization. >>>>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ >>>>>> >>>>>> thanks, >>>>>> Joe >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> *Joe Sutherland* >>>>>> Communications Intern [remote] >>>>>> m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu >>>>>> | w: JSutherland >>>>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF) >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> FB/G+ LGTM >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Social-media mailing list >>>> Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Ed Erhart >>> Editorial Intern >>> Wikimedia Foundation >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Social-media mailing list >>> Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Social-media mailing list >> Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >> >> > > > -- > *Joe Sutherland* > Communications Intern [remote] > m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: > JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF) >
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
-- Yana Welinder Legal Director Wikimedia Foundation 415.839.6885 ext. 6867 @yanatweets https://twitter.com/yanatweets
NOTICE: This message may be confidential or legally privileged. If you have received it by accident, please delete it and let us know about the mistake.
As an attorney for the Wikimedia Foundation, for legal/ethical reasons I cannot give legal advice to, or serve as a lawyer for, community members, volunteers, or staff members in their personal capacity. In other words, IANYL https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IANAL. For more on what this means, please see our legal disclaimer https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Legal_Disclaimer.
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
-- Yana Welinder Legal Director Wikimedia Foundation 415.839.6885 ext. 6867 @yanatweets https://twitter.com/yanatweets
NOTICE: This message may be confidential or legally privileged. If you have received it by accident, please delete it and let us know about the mistake.
As an attorney for the Wikimedia Foundation, for legal/ethical reasons I cannot give legal advice to, or serve as a lawyer for, community members, volunteers, or staff members in their personal capacity. In other words, IANYL https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IANAL. For more on what this means, please see our legal disclaimer https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Legal_Disclaimer.
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Michael Guss Research Analyst Wikimediafoundation.org mguss@wikimedia.org
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
I think the Foundation is fine, not my favorite phrasing but the context that surrounds it makes it a lot cleaner. I do hate using @Wikimedia from @Wikimedia (and @Wikipedia from @Wikipedia) except for retweets of course.
The good news I actually think this is a moot point most of the time, it's been rare recently that I have had (or heard) a concern about the clarity of our tweets in this regard :). We're relatively good at working in "Wikimedia Foundation' or some other phrasing to get the point across without sacrificing the tweet.
James Alexander Community Advocacy Wikimedia Foundation (415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Joe Sutherland jsutherland@wikimedia.org wrote:
If you're tweeting from @wikimedia that wouldn't do, of course. We could probably do "the Foundation" though?
Joe
On 4 August 2015 at 18:24, Michael Guss mguss@wikimedia.org wrote:
so, would not using "@Wikimedia Foundation" suffice?
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Joe Sutherland < jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote:
That's a good workaround. I'd be wary of upsetting the community (there are at least some of them who dislike the usage of "Wikimedia" to refer to the Foundation alone), but this seems a rare enough occurance :)
On 4 August 2015 at 17:48, Yana Welinder ywelinder@wikimedia.org wrote:
I usually use @Wikimedia as that handle is then defined "The official account of the Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit that operates @Wikipedia." Would work for tweets from @Wikipedia. Not sure if that would be weird coming from @Wikimedia :)
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Joe Sutherland < jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Sure, can do. The counter argument to that is that we probably shouldn't use "Wikimedia" to refer to the Foundation, since really it refers to the whole movement. We can use Wikimedia Foundation, though.
Joe
On 4 August 2015 at 17:43, Yana Welinder ywelinder@wikimedia.org wrote:
Nice! If we are doing a second tweet about this, I'd advise against abbreviating "Wikimedia" as "WMF" as it's not very well-known outside a small circle of people.
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Joe Sutherland < jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> We've shared: > > FB: https://www.facebook.com/wikipedia/posts/10153431035108346 > > @Wikipedia: https://twitter.com/Wikipedia/status/628595487982141440 > @Wikimedia: https://twitter.com/Wikimedia/status/628595488040853504 > > WP G+: > https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/100123345029543043288/+Wikipedia/posts/JvJbTPo... > WMF G+: > https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/108193079736330787108/108193079736330787108/po... > > On 4 August 2015 at 16:05, Joe Sutherland <jsutherland@wikimedia.org > > wrote: > >> I think avoiding tags (in favour of using an image) would be the >> best idea. Tweets with images I believe tend to do better anyway. Thoughts? >> >> Joe >> >> On 4 August 2015 at 06:30, James Alexander < >> jalexander@wikimedia.org> wrote: >> >>> I tend to agree more tweets would be better from us :) A >>> multi-tweet sounds like a good compromise. >>> >>> James Alexander >>> Community Advocacy >>> Wikimedia Foundation >>> (415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Why not multiple tweets, one of which has the mentions? We don't >>>> send out enough tweets anyway IMHO, and it's a good way to personally yet >>>> publicly acknowledge them. >>>> >>>> --Ed >>>> >>>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 9:39 PM, James Alexander < >>>> jalexander@wikimedia.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Article looks good, while I watched it from home (it was one of >>>>> those days sadly) I loved how the speakers actually had wildly different >>>>> views at times which has not always been the case for these events (which >>>>> is not required :) I enjoyed those too ). SM Comments inline >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Yana Welinder < >>>>> ywelinder@wikimedia.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Looks great! Do we want to include the speakers' twitter >>>>>> handles so that they retweet it to their followers? If so, here they are: >>>>>> @PamelaSamuelson @LilaBaileyLaw @dreamword @melvingibbs @yanatweets >>>>>> >>>>>> Feel free to leave me out if you run out of characters. I'll >>>>>> retweet it regardless. :) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Hmm, I give some options below (even without mentioning you it's >>>>> too long without adjustment) but I'd actually stay away from mentions given >>>>> how many there are. I just think the tweet itself starts to become so >>>>> cluttered it's hard to use and understand for the average reader. That >>>>> would end up with 5-6 different links in the tweet which is pretty rough. >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Joe Sutherland < >>>>>> jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hey all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We just published "Wikimedia Foundation hosts lively panel on >>>>>>> copyright" to the blog. URL: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Many thanks to Lexie, Yana and Michelle for this post. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as >>>>>>> needed. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Twitter (@wikipedia/@wikimedia):* >>>>>>> • Wikimedia Foundation Legal event draws 100+ to discuss >>>>>>> copyright. >>>>>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> • Wikimedia hosts copyright experts debating recent mass >>>>>>> digitization policy proposal. >>>>>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> - Both LGTM, personally I'd avoid mentions (picking just 1 >>>>> or 2 to mention isn't fair and all 4-5 makes it very cluttered) and go with >>>>> the 2nd one but I'm happy with both :). If we want to do the mentions then >>>>> we'd probably have to take #1 and adjust it for length. Some options below. >>>>> - Wikimedia Legal event draws 100+ to discuss copyright. @ >>>>> PamelaSamuelson https://twitter.com/PamelaSamuelson @ >>>>> LilaBaileyLaw https://twitter.com/LilaBaileyLaw @ >>>>> dreamword https://twitter.com/dreamword @melvingibbs >>>>> https://twitter.com/melvingibbs >>>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ [6char >>>>> left] >>>>> - WMF Legal event draws 100+ to discuss copyright. @ >>>>> PamelaSamuelson https://twitter.com/PamelaSamuelson @ >>>>> LilaBaileyLaw https://twitter.com/LilaBaileyLaw @ >>>>> dreamword https://twitter.com/dreamword @melvingibbs >>>>> https://twitter.com/melvingibbs @yanatweets >>>>> https://twitter.com/yanatweets >>>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ [0 >>>>> left] >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Facebook/Google+:* >>>>>>> • The Wikimedia Foundation hosts leading voices on copyright >>>>>>> for a lively panel on mass digitization. >>>>>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> thanks, >>>>>>> Joe >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> *Joe Sutherland* >>>>>>> Communications Intern [remote] >>>>>>> m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu >>>>>>> | w: JSutherland >>>>>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF) >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> FB/G+ LGTM >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Social-media mailing list >>>>> Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org >>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Ed Erhart >>>> Editorial Intern >>>> Wikimedia Foundation >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Social-media mailing list >>>> Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Social-media mailing list >>> Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> *Joe Sutherland* >> Communications Intern [remote] >> m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | >> w: JSutherland >> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF) >> > > > > -- > *Joe Sutherland* > Communications Intern [remote] > m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: > JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF) >
-- Yana Welinder Legal Director Wikimedia Foundation 415.839.6885 ext. 6867 @yanatweets https://twitter.com/yanatweets
NOTICE: This message may be confidential or legally privileged. If you have received it by accident, please delete it and let us know about the mistake.
As an attorney for the Wikimedia Foundation, for legal/ethical reasons I cannot give legal advice to, or serve as a lawyer for, community members, volunteers, or staff members in their personal capacity. In other words, IANYL https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IANAL. For more on what this means, please see our legal disclaimer https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Legal_Disclaimer.
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
-- Yana Welinder Legal Director Wikimedia Foundation 415.839.6885 ext. 6867 @yanatweets https://twitter.com/yanatweets
NOTICE: This message may be confidential or legally privileged. If you have received it by accident, please delete it and let us know about the mistake.
As an attorney for the Wikimedia Foundation, for legal/ethical reasons I cannot give legal advice to, or serve as a lawyer for, community members, volunteers, or staff members in their personal capacity. In other words, IANYL https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IANAL. For more on what this means, please see our legal disclaimer https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Legal_Disclaimer.
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Michael Guss Research Analyst Wikimediafoundation.org mguss@wikimedia.org
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
social-media@lists.wikimedia.org