We've shared:

FB: https://www.facebook.com/wikipedia/posts/10153431035108346

@Wikipedia: https://twitter.com/Wikipedia/status/628595487982141440
@Wikimedia: https://twitter.com/Wikimedia/status/628595488040853504

WP G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/100123345029543043288/+Wikipedia/posts/JvJbTPotepg
WMF G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/108193079736330787108/108193079736330787108/posts/cb4ntxEiB1H

On 4 August 2015 at 16:05, Joe Sutherland <jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote:
I think avoiding tags (in favour of using an image) would be the best idea. Tweets with images I believe tend to do better anyway. Thoughts?

Joe

On 4 August 2015 at 06:30, James Alexander <jalexander@wikimedia.org> wrote:
I tend to agree more tweets would be better from us :) A multi-tweet sounds like a good compromise.

James Alexander
Community Advocacy
Wikimedia Foundation
(415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur

On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Ed Erhart <eerhart@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Why not multiple tweets, one of which has the mentions? We don't send out enough tweets anyway IMHO, and it's a good way to personally yet publicly acknowledge them.

--Ed

On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 9:39 PM, James Alexander <jalexander@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Article looks good, while I watched it from home (it was one of those days sadly) I loved how the speakers actually had wildly different views at times which has not always been the case for these events (which is not required :) I enjoyed those too ). SM Comments inline

On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Yana Welinder <ywelinder@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Looks great!  Do we want to include the speakers' twitter handles so that they retweet it to their followers? If so, here they are: @PamelaSamuelson @LilaBaileyLaw @dreamword @melvingibbs @yanatweets

Feel free to leave me out if you run out of characters. I'll retweet it regardless. :)


Hmm, I give some options below (even without mentioning you it's too long without adjustment) but I'd actually stay away from mentions given how many there are. I just think the tweet itself starts to become so cluttered it's hard to use and understand for the average reader. That would end up with 5-6 different links in the tweet which is pretty rough. 

On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Joe Sutherland <jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Hey all,

We just published "Wikimedia Foundation hosts lively panel on copyright" to the blog. URL:

https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/

Many thanks to Lexie, Yana and Michelle for this post.

Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as needed.

Twitter (@wikipedia/@wikimedia):
• Wikimedia Foundation Legal event draws 100+ to discuss copyright. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/

• Wikimedia hosts copyright experts debating recent mass digitization policy proposal. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/



Facebook/Google+:
• The Wikimedia Foundation hosts leading voices on copyright for a lively panel on mass digitization. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/

thanks,
Joe

--
Joe Sutherland
Communications Intern [remote]

FB/G+ LGTM 

_______________________________________________
Social-media mailing list
Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media




--
Ed Erhart
Editorial Intern
Wikimedia Foundation

_______________________________________________
Social-media mailing list
Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media



_______________________________________________
Social-media mailing list
Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media




--
Joe Sutherland
Communications Intern [remote]



--
Joe Sutherland
Communications Intern [remote]
m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu | w: JSutherland