Yeah, especially since we're posting from @Wikipedia I don't think it's needed either.
It is a bit passive aggressive but it gets the point of the article across and I'm not sure it's possible to do that without being a bit either passive or actively aggressive ;)
James Alexander Community Advocacy Wikimedia Foundation (415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Joe Sutherland jsutherland@wikimedia.org wrote:
LGTM. I don't think it's a good idea to hashtag Wikipedia based on Michael's advice on searches for that term though.
best, Joe
On 7 August 2015 at 22:51, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi all,
We just published "Wikipedia better equipped to deal with systemic bias than traditional publishers" to the Wikimedia blog.
https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/07/systemic-bias-wikipedia-vs-publishers
Comments on the tone would be appreciated—I veered a little bit into passive-aggressive territory.
*Twitter:*The Basic Art series from @TASCHENBooks is missing 100 famous women, but #Wikipedia has them all.
*Facebook/G+:*The Basic Art series from Taschen Books is missing 100 famous women, but #Wikipedia has them all.
-- Ed Erhart Editorial Intern Wikimedia Foundation
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media