Yeah, especially since we're posting from @Wikipedia I don't think it's needed either. 

It is a bit passive aggressive but it gets the point of the article across and I'm not sure it's possible to do that without being a bit either passive or actively aggressive ;)

James Alexander
Community Advocacy
Wikimedia Foundation
(415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur

On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Joe Sutherland <jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote:
LGTM. I don't think it's a good idea to hashtag Wikipedia based on Michael's advice on searches for that term though.

best,
Joe

On 7 August 2015 at 22:51, Ed Erhart <eerhart@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Hi all,

We just published "Wikipedia better equipped to deal with systemic bias than traditional publishers" to the Wikimedia blog.

https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/07/systemic-bias-wikipedia-vs-publishers

Comments on the tone would be appreciated—I veered a little bit into passive-aggressive territory.

Twitter:

The Basic Art series from @TASCHENBooks is missing 100 famous women, but #Wikipedia has them all.

Facebook/G+:

The Basic Art series from Taschen Books is missing 100 famous women, but #Wikipedia has them all.

--
Ed Erhart
Editorial Intern
Wikimedia Foundation

_______________________________________________
Social-media mailing list
Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media




--
Joe Sutherland
Communications Intern [remote]

_______________________________________________
Social-media mailing list
Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media