I agree with you Pine, but also with Jeff - there's a difference in
tweeting about the community's interests and about the staff members'
interests, even if the staff are also community :)
No skin off my nose in this case really. Was just a suggestion, and like
all suggestions, can be declined!
Joe
On 14 April 2016 at 18:16, Pine W <wiki.pine(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hmm. I think that WMF already posted about Ed's
battleships if I recall
correctly. I think that's like someone posting about their favorite flower,
animal, vacation spot, economist, car brand, or television series. Just as
on Wikipedia, people tend to write about subjects that they're interested
in. If we prohibited people from writing about all of their personal
interests, then we would have a very small number of writers.
That said, what I would be thinking about are noteability and undue
weight. For example, someone tweetung daily from a WMF account about
different types of rocks would be a problem as that would likely give undue
weight to that subject.
I'm sensitive to COI as well, but it's possible to be so sensitive to it
that lots of benign activities would fall under the definition of COI.
Pine
_______________________________________________
Social-media mailing list
Social-media(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
--
*Joe Sutherland*
Communications Fellow [remote]
joesutherland.rocks | @jrbsu <http://twitter.com/jrbsu> | +44 (0) 7722 916
433