In terms of byte size, that article isn't even in the top 250. See https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:LongPages&redirect=...
Pine On Jun 12, 2015 9:31 AM, "Joe Sutherland" jsutherland@wikimedia.org wrote:
Generally the Obama article's used as a baseline since it's enormous. I don't know if it's the most complex article on Wikipedia but it's gotta be close.
As for a more thorough piece of research, I don't personally know what the procedure is for these sorts of things.
Joe
On 12 June 2015 at 17:29, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
Is it necessary to use the Obama example at all? There are others that WMF could test independently. Or how about communicating a median improvement time for the most popular 100 Wikipedia articles in all languages? Waiting a month for test results would be ok, right?
Pine
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media