Generally the Obama article's used as a baseline since it's enormous. I don't know if it's the most complex article on Wikipedia but it's gotta be close.

As for a more thorough piece of research, I don't personally know what the procedure is for these sorts of things.

Joe

On 12 June 2015 at 17:29, Pine W <wiki.pine@gmail.com> wrote:

Is it necessary to use the Obama example at all? There are others that WMF could test independently. Or how about communicating a median improvement time for the most popular 100 Wikipedia articles in all languages? Waiting a month for test results would be ok, right?

Pine

_______________________________________________
Social-media mailing list
Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media

--

Joe Sutherland
Communications Intern [remote]

m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu | w: JSutherland

_______________________________________________
Social-media mailing list
Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media