Thanks, Andrew! While the social content is strong I'm not sure if this article is appropriate to share. It doesn't tell a great story about us with regard to HTTPS. It's not overly negative, but not great - especially the headline. What do others think?
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Andrew Sherman asherman@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hello Everyone,
Michael and I created some social for another story. URL:
http://motherboard.vice.com/read/wikipedia-wants-a-more-secure-web-but-its-n...
Below are some proposed social media messages. Tweak as needed.
Tweet structure:
Account: @wikipedia
“We would like to see all internet traffic encrypted,” @lilatretikov, Wikimedia Foundation’s executive director. @motherboard
Wikipedia must reach a balance between accessibility, privacy, and surveillance. -- Collin Anderson, researcher for Iran’s Wikipedia censorship. @motherboard
Facebook structure:
Account: Wikipedia
Wikipedia has “to balance between accessibility and privacy and surveillance.” -- Collin Anderson, researcher for Iran’s Wikipedia censorship.
Wikipedia offers an encrypted version of its site, but it doesn’t force all visitors to use it. Staying accessible while remaining private.
Google+ structure:
Account: Wikipedia
Wikipedia censorship is a growing issue. The NSA surveillance creates a concern for Wikipedia and its users. The challenges of staying safe and accessible. +MotherboardTV
NSA surveillance can be combated by encryption. See how Wikipedia is choosing to handle HTTPS encryption for its users.
Thanks,
-- Andrew Sherman Digital Communications | Wikimedia Foundation
*E:* asherman@wikimedia.org *WMF:* ASherman (WMF) https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:ASherman_(WMF)
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media