Thanks, Andrew! While the social content is strong I'm not sure if this article is appropriate to share. It doesn't tell a great story about us with regard to HTTPS. It's not overly negative, but not great - especially the headline. What do others think? 

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Andrew Sherman <asherman@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Hello Everyone,

Michael and I created some social for another story. URL:

http://motherboard.vice.com/read/wikipedia-wants-a-more-secure-web-but-its-not-encrypted-by-default

Below are some proposed social media messages. Tweak as needed.

Tweet structure:


Account: @wikipedia


“We would like to see all internet traffic encrypted,” @lilatretikov, Wikimedia Foundation’s executive director. @motherboard


Wikipedia must reach a balance between accessibility, privacy, and surveillance. -- Collin Anderson, researcher for Iran’s Wikipedia censorship. @motherboard


Facebook structure:


Account: Wikipedia


Wikipedia has “to balance between accessibility and privacy and surveillance.” -- Collin Anderson, researcher for Iran’s Wikipedia censorship.


Wikipedia offers an encrypted version of its site, but it doesn’t force all visitors to use it. Staying accessible while remaining private.


Google+ structure:


Account: Wikipedia


Wikipedia censorship is a growing issue. The NSA surveillance creates a concern  for Wikipedia and its users. The challenges of staying safe and accessible. +MotherboardTV


NSA surveillance can be combated by encryption. See how Wikipedia is choosing to handle HTTPS encryption for its users.


Thanks,

--
Andrew Sherman
Digital Communications | Wikimedia Foundation

_______________________________________________
Social-media mailing list
Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media




--
Juliet Barbara
Senior Communications Manager I Wikimedia Foundation
149 New Montgomery Street I San Francisco, CA 94105
jbarbara@wikimedia.org I +1 (512) 750-5677