All,
we have two new requests for review in the RCom pipeline:
A qualitative research project for an undergraduate dissertation by John Wallis, an
ethnography student at Cambridge University
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Qualitative_research_for_an_undergr…
A new project by University of Oregon PhD student Randall Livingstone (User:UOJComm)
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Understanding_the_Editor/Bot_Relati…
(Randall is the same person who ran this study:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:WPCSB_survey )
I second Aaron that we should start sharing responsibilities within RCom to handle these
requests (before a system like OTRS or Sugar is introduced).
If you wish to take the lead on the review of these proposals, please edit the project
template and add your name as WMF contact. I'll assign these requests by Wednesday if
no one volunteers.
I'll be talking next week to Ben Cowan for his project on wiki anxiety, please let me
know if you wish to be part of the conference call.
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research_talk:Investigating_editing_anxiety_…
Best,
Dario
On Sep 19, 2011, at 9:05 AM, Diederik van Liere wrote:
Hi Dana,
I would ask Dario to coordinate this.
Best,
Diederik
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Dana Isokawa <disokawa(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
Hi everyone,
Randall has asked that someone please review his request sooner rather than
later, as he wants enough time to properly coordinate interviews during
WikiSym (10/3-10/5). Is there any chance someone could please review his
request?
Thanks!
Dana
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Aaron Halfaker <aaron.halfaker(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
I wonder if someone who hasn't lead a research proposal and discussion
before could take this one. I might volunteer, but the beginning of the
semester responsibilities make it hard to do more than participate.
Any volunteers?
-Aaron
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Randall Livingstone
<livingst(a)uoregon.edu> wrote:
Greetings-
I am sending this request both to Dario Taraborelli (who I've dealt with
in the past on a research project review and approval) and to what I
understand is the appropriate email for the RC at large (as I understand
Dario is currently unavailable). I have recently created a Meta page for a
new research project, Understanding the Editor/Bot Relationship, and I would
like to request a RC review of the project so I can move forward with
participant recruitment. I have already received IRB approval from the
University of Oregon (protocol #08262011.107, 8/30/2011).
Please let me know if there are additional steps necessary on my end for
review, or if this request should be sent to a different contact person,
list, or committee. Thank you very much in advance for your time and
attention.
Sincerely,
Randall Livingstone
User: UOJComm
--
Randall Livingstone
Doctoral Candidate & Graduate Teaching Fellow
School of Journalism & Communication
University of Oregon
livingst(a)uoregon.edu
_______________________________________________
RCom-l mailing list
RCom-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/rcom-l
_______________________________________________
RCom-l mailing list
RCom-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/rcom-l
--
Dana Isokawa
Executive Assistant to the VP of Engineering and Product Development
+1 415 839 6885 ext 6689
www.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
RCom-l mailing list
RCom-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/rcom-l
--
<a href="http://about.me/diederik">Check out my about.me
profile!</a>
_______________________________________________
RCom-l mailing list
RCom-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/rcom-l