Couldn't find the url. Can someone paste it?. Thanks !
--Matias
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 10-05-26 11:43 PM, Matias wrote:
Couldn't find the url. Can someone paste it?. Thanks !
--Matias
Sadly, they don't use bugzilla. They use (god help us) http://sf.net/projects/pywikipediabot
- -Mike
Sadly, they don't use bugzilla. They use (god help us)
:) no bugs open there. I want to contribute to the framework. Any work needed? Maybe implementing the "not implemented" class functions?
--Matias
really? no bugs?
Check http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=93107 =)
2010/5/27 Matias plinbox@gmail.com:
Sadly, they don't use bugzilla. They use (god help us)
:) no bugs open there. I want to contribute to the framework. Any work needed? Maybe implementing the "not implemented" class functions?
--Matias
Pywikipedia-l mailing list Pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:02 AM, Nicolas Dumazet nicdumz@gmail.com wrote:
really? no bugs?
At least not open for the rewrite category :)
then, for the rewrite a good job is to help porting all the scripts that are at the moment available in pywikipediabot but that are not yet in branches/rewrite/scripts/ (also, some of the scripts that are ported might need more tests/improvements)
While it's not necessarily fun, it's required so bot owners can seamlessly migrate to the rewrite branch :)
Thanks for your help!
2010/5/27 Matias plinbox@gmail.com:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:02 AM, Nicolas Dumazet nicdumz@gmail.com wrote:
really? no bugs?
At least not open for the rewrite category :)
Pywikipedia-l mailing list Pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Nicolas Dumazet nicdumz@gmail.com wrote:
then, for the rewrite a good job is to help porting all the scripts that are at the moment available in pywikipediabot but that are not yet in branches/rewrite/scripts/ (also, some of the scripts that are ported might need more tests/improvements)
While it's not necessarily fun, it's required so bot owners can seamlessly migrate to the rewrite branch :)
Ok, I'll work on that. Is any place where we could coordinate efforts, I mean like not start working on something someone has already started?
--Matias
http://www.botwiki.sno.cc/wiki/Rewrite/Porting_status was created with this goal in mind, but might be out of date. Feel free to announce there that you're working on this or that other script. This mailing list is also fine, as the few active ones involved in pywikibot do read it :)
Regards,
2010/5/27 Matias plinbox@gmail.com:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Nicolas Dumazet nicdumz@gmail.com wrote:
then, for the rewrite a good job is to help porting all the scripts that are at the moment available in pywikipediabot but that are not yet in branches/rewrite/scripts/ (also, some of the scripts that are ported might need more tests/improvements)
While it's not necessarily fun, it's required so bot owners can seamlessly migrate to the rewrite branch :)
Ok, I'll work on that. Is any place where we could coordinate efforts, I mean like not start working on something someone has already started?
--Matias
Pywikipedia-l mailing list Pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
Is not better that create a new category for pybot(and rewrite branch too)on bugzila?for unity
Cheers
On 5/27/10, Nicolas Dumazet nicdumz@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.botwiki.sno.cc/wiki/Rewrite/Porting_status was created with this goal in mind, but might be out of date. Feel free to announce there that you're working on this or that other script. This mailing list is also fine, as the few active ones involved in pywikibot do read it :)
Regards,
2010/5/27 Matias plinbox@gmail.com:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Nicolas Dumazet nicdumz@gmail.com wrote:
then, for the rewrite a good job is to help porting all the scripts that are at the moment available in pywikipediabot but that are not yet in branches/rewrite/scripts/ (also, some of the scripts that are ported might need more tests/improvements)
While it's not necessarily fun, it's required so bot owners can seamlessly migrate to the rewrite branch :)
Ok, I'll work on that. Is any place where we could coordinate efforts, I mean like not start working on something someone has already started?
--Matias
Pywikipedia-l mailing list Pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
-- Nicolas Dumazet — NicDumZ
Pywikipedia-l mailing list Pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
It would make more sense to rename https://jira.toolserver.org/browse/PYWP from pywikipedia to pywikibot and fill new rewrite/ bugs overthere, if others agree on that.
bugzilla is a mediawiki thing, and is just as (un-)useful as sourceforge tracker. If we want to change tools, switch for something better than what we have...
2010/5/27 Amir sarabadani ladsgroup@gmail.com:
Is not better that create a new category for pybot(and rewrite branch too)on bugzila?for unity
Cheers
On 5/27/10, Nicolas Dumazet nicdumz@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.botwiki.sno.cc/wiki/Rewrite/Porting_status was created with this goal in mind, but might be out of date. Feel free to announce there that you're working on this or that other script. This mailing list is also fine, as the few active ones involved in pywikibot do read it :)
Regards,
2010/5/27 Matias plinbox@gmail.com:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Nicolas Dumazet nicdumz@gmail.com wrote:
then, for the rewrite a good job is to help porting all the scripts that are at the moment available in pywikipediabot but that are not yet in branches/rewrite/scripts/ (also, some of the scripts that are ported might need more tests/improvements)
While it's not necessarily fun, it's required so bot owners can seamlessly migrate to the rewrite branch :)
Ok, I'll work on that. Is any place where we could coordinate efforts, I mean like not start working on something someone has already started?
--Matias
Pywikipedia-l mailing list Pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
-- Nicolas Dumazet — NicDumZ
Pywikipedia-l mailing list Pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
-- Amir
Pywikipedia-l mailing list Pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
On 27 May 2010 08:04, Nicolas Dumazet nicdumz@gmail.com wrote:
It would make more sense to rename https://jira.toolserver.org/browse/PYWP from pywikipedia to pywikibot and fill new rewrite/ bugs overthere, if others agree on that.
This is probably the best suggestion. JIRA rocks - except for the import of bugs. If we use it for the rewrite branch, there is no need for importing any bugs - so we do have the benefits, but not the disadvantage :-)
Oh, and seriously, bugzilla is even worse than the sf.net tracker. At least the sf.net tracker has a sort-of-sensible interface.
Merlijn
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:22:11AM -0300, Matias wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Nicolas Dumazet nicdumz@gmail.com wrote:
then, for the rewrite a good job is to help porting all the scripts that are at the moment available in pywikipediabot but that are not yet in branches/rewrite/scripts/ (also, some of the scripts that are ported might need more tests/improvements)
Ok, I'll work on that. Is any place where we could coordinate efforts, I mean like not start working on something someone has already started?
Just for the record in case you didn't notice it earlier, I've started to work on welcome.py (I still have an unanswered question before submitting the patch - see my previous mail entitled "rewrite and the translate function" or something like that).
I also have a custom framework built on top of pywikipedia that allows data access via mysql instead of api calls (which I extensively use on the toolserver). I'll consider refactoring it to suit rewrite's scheme (comm/data/...) if others think it could be useful.
stan.
Here is sth according the rewrite:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=3007742&gr...
:) xqt
----- Original Nachricht ---- Von: Matias plinbox@gmail.com An: Pywikipedia discussion list pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Datum: 27.05.2010 05:06 Betreff: Re: [Pywikipedia-l] Pywikibot bugzilla
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:02 AM, Nicolas Dumazet nicdumz@gmail.com wrote:
really? no bugs?
At least not open for the rewrite category :)
Pywikipedia-l mailing list Pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
Und was machen Sie heute abend? Alles Events Ihrer Gegend auf einen Blick im Arcor.de-Veranstaltungskalender: http://www.arcor.de/rd/footer.events
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 8:11 AM, info@gno.de wrote:
Here is sth according the rewrite:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=3007742&gr...
:) xqt
That would be me .. :)
--Pyr0
Is anybody invited to reduce or disable bot edits due to icelandic bot policy? I made a proposal on my talk page: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer_Diskussion:Xqt#Please_don.27t_run_on_t... If anybody wants to join to this discussion, you are welcome.
xqt
Und was machen Sie heute abend? Alles Events Ihrer Gegend auf einen Blick im Arcor.de-Veranstaltungskalender: http://www.arcor.de/rd/footer.events
On 05/27/2010 07:56 PM, info@gno.de wrote:
Is anybody invited to reduce or disable bot edits due to icelandic bot policy? I made a proposal on my talk page: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer_Diskussion:Xqt#Please_don.27t_run_on_t... If anybody wants to join to this discussion, you are welcome.
xqt
well I just disabled my bot there. The way they blocked all the bots is, in my opinion, unacceptable.
masti
2010/5/27 info@gno.de
Is anybody invited to reduce or disable bot edits due to icelandic bot policy? I made a proposal on my talk page: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer_Diskussion:Xqt#Please_don.27t_run_on_t... If anybody wants to join to this discussion, you are welcome.
I also received a similar message requesting to stop my bot on that wiki:
http://eu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lankide_eztabaida:TXiKi#Please_don.27t_run_on_t...
I can't figure out their new bot policy, and I've left a message on his talk page. I'm awaiting a response.
Actually, the problem of preventing global bots to work on a wiki is not only for Icelandic Wikipedia, but also for the rest of the languages. When a bot works correcting interwiki links that point at an incorrect page, the corrections should be done to each and every language to get it fixed. Correcting it in all the languages but Icelandic will make the problem persist, and the "autonomous problem" won't be fixed.
Arkaitz
2010/5/28 Arkaitz Zubiaga arkaitz.zubiaga@gmail.com
2010/5/27 info@gno.de
Is anybody invited to reduce or disable bot edits due to icelandic bot policy? I made a proposal on my talk page: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer_Diskussion:Xqt#Please_don.27t_run_on_t... If anybody wants to join to this discussion, you are welcome.
I posted a possible solution into the talk page you linked. Alex
I see a few here ;-) http://tinyurl.com/35qmlsv
--Manuelt15
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 23:54:31 -0300 From: plinbox@gmail.com To: pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Pywikipedia-l] Pywikibot bugzilla
Sadly, they don't use bugzilla. They use (god help us)
http://sf.net/projects/pywikipediabot
:) no bugs open there. I want to contribute to the framework. Any work needed? Maybe implementing the "not implemented" class functions?
--Matias _________________________________________________________________ Almacenamiento ilimitado, más cerca de lo que pensabas. Hotmail te 25 GB gratis. Regístrate ahora http://mail.live.com/
pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org