Indeed an other problem. I heared from other bot owners they got py2.4 (!) with the server.
----- Original Nachricht ---- Von: "Dr. Trigon" dr.trigon@surfeu.ch An: Pywikipedia discussion list pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Datum: 10.10.2010 22:20 Betreff: Re: [Pywikipedia-l] Why not Python 3?
Thanks a lot for this link! Interessting document!
I just decided to let the choice be done form me by my OS developper (f13 -> redhat) and the toolserver staff... ;))
Greetings
Am 08.10.2010 08:43, schrieb Jeremy Baron:
Have you read http://wiki.python.org/moin/Python2orPython3 ?
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 02:35, Dr. Trigondr.trigon@surfeu.ch wrote:
I think the question here is:
- how mature is py3?
- how many experiences do we have with it?
greetings
Am 06.10.2010 17:57, schrieb Bináris:
Hi!
It is obvious, that we will have to let Python 2.x to go one day. Now the developers have been working on Pywikipedia 2 for a long time, and are looking forward to release it. But what then? How long will itt
work?
In the past weeks I was dealing with Python very much, and I have ideas on 2 vs. 3. I tried to guess the reason not to use Python 3. As far as I see, the main problem is with the big quantity of u"..."s. But I they can probably be converted py the 2to3 module. So what is the main reason to keep 2.x?
-- Bináris
Pywikipedia-l mailing list Pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
Pywikipedia-l mailing list Pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l