Indeed an other problem. I heared from other bot owners they got py2.4 (!) with the
server.
----- Original Nachricht ----
Von: "Dr. Trigon" <dr.trigon(a)surfeu.ch>
An: Pywikipedia discussion list <pywikipedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Datum: 10.10.2010 22:20
Betreff: Re: [Pywikipedia-l] Why not Python 3?
Thanks a lot for this link! Interessting document!
I just decided to let the choice be done form me by my OS developper
(f13 -> redhat) and the toolserver staff... ;))
Greetings
Am 08.10.2010 08:43, schrieb Jeremy Baron:
Have you read
http://wiki.python.org/moin/Python2orPython3 ?
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 02:35, Dr. Trigon<dr.trigon(a)surfeu.ch> wrote:
> I think the question here is:
> * how mature is py3?
> * how many experiences do we have with it?
>
> greetings
>
>
> Am 06.10.2010 17:57, schrieb Bináris:
>> Hi!
>>
>> It is obvious, that we will have to let Python 2.x to go one day. Now
>> the developers have been working on Pywikipedia 2 for a long time, and
>> are looking forward to release it. But what then? How long will itt
work?
>
> In the past weeks I was dealing with Python very much, and I have ideas
> on 2 vs. 3. I tried to guess the reason not to use Python 3. As far as I
> see, the main problem is with the big quantity of u"..."s. But I they
> can probably be converted py the 2to3 module. So what is the main reason
> to keep 2.x?
>
> --
> Bináris
_______________________________________________
Pywikipedia-l mailing list
Pywikipedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
_______________________________________________
Pywikipedia-l mailing list
Pywikipedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l