-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Although this is possible, I'm not sure what we
gain by doing this
- is the problem the length of the hash? Or do you want a number
that increases? If so - why?
The point is revision numbers are slightly more useful than hashes.
The reason is you can compare them on < (less than) and > (bigger
than) whereas hashes you can just compare for = (equality). So with
hashes you can just say "same" revision or not, but with revisions you
can also say "newer", "older" may be even "very very old"...
;))
By the way the changes [1] and [2]
[1]
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/77554
[2]
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/77555
are "opt-in" in a double manner. First you have to use $pwbId$ and
second you have to enable 2 git filters in order to work.
Greetings
DrTrigon
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlIPnA0ACgkQAXWvBxzBrDDI6wCg5BdAGny1RNYTBK4E3dqWzGmZ
lmEAnisU2RKayyLFrlMewtXfIh11nMKP
=rJUB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----