Hi,
There are a few aspects of packaging which will benefit from more
brains and a collective decision we can all live with, both in the
short term for '2.0' and what we want long term (e.g. '2.1', etc).
I would appreciate assistance with...
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/pywikibot_2.0_packaging
--
John Vandenberg
In one week bugzilla will move to phabricator.
I am still not friend with phabricator, and I am not able to find how
to report bugs about pywikipedia. Is somewhere something about it,
some project etc?
JAnD
Hello pywikibot community,
cc wider Wikimedia community,
Given the discussion on pywikipedia-l on the bugzilla migration, I
thought it might be a good idea to have a more formal discussion
beforehand on what we, as pywikibot community, want to do once the
rest of the community moves from Gerrit to Phabricator.
As such, I've prepared an RFC draft [1], and I would welcome your input there.
Best,
Merlijn
[1] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/pywikibot_git_hosting
As a workaround, chdir to the pwb.py path before running, or explicitly
define the user-config path with -dir:/path/where/pwb.py/is
On 9 Nov 2014 15:10, <bugzilla-daemon(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
> https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72680
>
> Steinsplitter <steinsplitter(a)wikipedia.de> changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Priority|Unprioritized |High
> CC| |
> steinsplitter(a)wikipedia.de
> Severity|normal |major
>
> --- Comment #8 from Steinsplitter <steinsplitter(a)wikipedia.de> ---
> It breaks all bots with the newest version on toolslabs
>
> --
> You are receiving this mail because:
> You are the assignee for the bug.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pywikipedia-bugs mailing list
> Pywikipedia-bugs(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-bugs
>